27.07.2013 Views

Organised Crime & Crime Prevention - what works? - Scandinavian ...

Organised Crime & Crime Prevention - what works? - Scandinavian ...

Organised Crime & Crime Prevention - what works? - Scandinavian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NSfK’s 40. forskerseminar, Espoo, Finland 1998<br />

Year Registered intentional serious bodily injuries<br />

Lithuania Latvia Estonia<br />

1992 346 571 223<br />

1993 344 725 220<br />

1994 353 714 248<br />

1995 299 597 223<br />

1996 351 467 229<br />

The state of registered intentional serious bodily injuries in all the Baltic states is stable. Only<br />

in Latvia during 1993-1994 was there a markedly greater number of serious bodily injuries<br />

than were registered during the other three years.<br />

Beyond doubt, the intensiveness of the spreading of these crimes is the smallest in Lithuania.<br />

In general, serious violent crimes in the Baltic countries make up about 2 per cent of the<br />

overall number of registered crimes.<br />

The crime situation in every country is also reliably characterized by the level of clearance<br />

rates in the Baltic states, which are illustrated in the following table.<br />

Table 11. Percent of crimes closed in the Baltic States during 1992-1996<br />

Year Closed crimes (percent)<br />

Lithuania Latvia Estonia<br />

1992 35 26 18<br />

1993 37 28 25<br />

1994 41 31 27<br />

1995 40 35 29<br />

1996 41 44 33<br />

As shown in table 11, during the investigated period of 1992-1996, the highest clearence rate<br />

in all years was in Lithuania. In the beginning of the period almost twice as many crimes were<br />

closed in Lithuania than in Estonia and one • third more than in Latvia.<br />

Generally, indicators of crime closure were constantly improving in all the Baltic countries,<br />

but even now they are not high: in Lithuania in 1996, 41 per cent of the registered crimes<br />

were closed, in Latvia 44 per cent, and in Estonia almost 10 per cent less • only 33 per cent.<br />

Conclusions<br />

1. Before the restoration of independence crime level in Lithuania was constantly smaller. In<br />

1988 the crime level in Lithuania was 1,5 times smaller then in Latvia and 1,3 times<br />

smaller than in Estonia.<br />

2. According to the indicators in 1989 the highest crime level per 10.000 inhabitants was in<br />

Estonia (121,1); in the second place was Latvia (110,6); in the third place Lithuania (84,9).<br />

3. During the period of independence changes in criminality in Lithuania were very similar to<br />

changes in Estonia (criminality in Lithuania until the year 1996 inclusive increased 2,2<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!