09.08.2013 Views

Dialogue in Pursuit of Development - Are you looking for one of ...

Dialogue in Pursuit of Development - Are you looking for one of ...

Dialogue in Pursuit of Development - Are you looking for one of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Challenge <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dialogue</strong> <strong>for</strong> Practiti<strong>one</strong>rs:<br />

Risk<strong>in</strong>g the Unexpected<br />

Naoki Suzuki 1<br />

189<br />

Introduction<br />

<strong>Dialogue</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational development is challeng<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> both donors and<br />

recipients. While dialogue obviously <strong>in</strong>volves listen<strong>in</strong>g and speak<strong>in</strong>g, can a<br />

donor really listen to a recipient, comprehend the message, and act on it?<br />

And can a recipient really speak truthfully to a donor, without <strong>in</strong>hibition?<br />

Both donor and recipient may appear fully capable <strong>of</strong> listen<strong>in</strong>g and speak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

However, if listen<strong>in</strong>g2 requires donors to change their plans, and if speak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

out causes recipients to risk their fund<strong>in</strong>g, can the parties still ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gful dialogue?<br />

This paper attempts to describe the challenges, constra<strong>in</strong>ts and opportunities<br />

<strong>of</strong> dialogue from the practiti<strong>one</strong>rs’ viewpo<strong>in</strong>t. Practiti<strong>one</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

development are the <strong>one</strong>s who normally work under an implement<strong>in</strong>g<br />

agency and make most <strong>of</strong> the direct contacts with all concerned<br />

parties to coord<strong>in</strong>ate all necessary tasks. Thus, they play a critical role <strong>in</strong><br />

facilitat<strong>in</strong>g dialogue between donors and recipients.<br />

This paper starts by present<strong>in</strong>g contextual challenges to donor-recipient<br />

dialogue, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g conflicts between stakeholders, <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> donorrecipient<br />

relationships, and development discourse <strong>in</strong> general. The paper<br />

then analyzes a critical event <strong>in</strong> a project funded by Japan International Cooperation<br />

Agency (JICA) to identify five important issues on dialogue. The<br />

case suggests that risk tak<strong>in</strong>g is required <strong>for</strong> a donor to establish effective<br />

donor-recipient dialogue.<br />

The second half <strong>of</strong> the paper is devoted to describ<strong>in</strong>g and analyz<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

research project <strong>in</strong> which I participated. Although it is different from development<br />

projects, this case can exemplify the nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions between<br />

a donor and a recipient <strong>in</strong> government-funded development projects, and<br />

1 Naoki Suzuki (Japan) holds a PhD <strong>in</strong> City and Regional Plann<strong>in</strong>g from Cornell University <strong>in</strong><br />

1996. At present he is Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>in</strong> Global Community Studies at Seisen University,<br />

Japan. He started his career as a member <strong>of</strong> Japan Overseas Co-operation Volunteers (JOCV)<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g as a secondary school teacher <strong>in</strong> Malawi and <strong>in</strong> Ethiopia as the country director direct<strong>in</strong>g<br />

relief and development projects. He was a Researcher at the Foundation <strong>for</strong> Advanced Studies on<br />

International <strong>Development</strong> (FASID) until 2001. He has been <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> progressive actions <strong>of</strong><br />

development practiti<strong>one</strong>rs who work <strong>in</strong> the face <strong>of</strong> conflict<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terests among stakeholders.<br />

2 Forester (1989) clearly dist<strong>in</strong>guishes listen<strong>in</strong>g from hear<strong>in</strong>g. Listen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves both speaker and<br />

listener as subjects rather than objects, while hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>volves an object. Listen<strong>in</strong>g requires care that<br />

creates a sense <strong>of</strong> mutuality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!