Dialogue in Pursuit of Development - Are you looking for one of ...
Dialogue in Pursuit of Development - Are you looking for one of ...
Dialogue in Pursuit of Development - Are you looking for one of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 1. Internal development ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa<br />
Region Sav<strong>in</strong>gs, per ODA, per cent ODA per<br />
cent <strong>of</strong> GDP <strong>of</strong> GDP capita (USD)<br />
Sub-Saharan Africa 14 4.1 21<br />
Low-Income Countries 19 1.3 7<br />
South Asia 19 0.9 4<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong> America 20 0.2 9<br />
East Asia 37 0.5 4<br />
Source: World Bank, World <strong>Development</strong> Report 2000/2001.<br />
As policy re<strong>for</strong>m was considered essential to br<strong>in</strong>g about positive developmental<br />
outcomes, <strong>in</strong> many <strong>for</strong>ums a ‘development policy dialogue’ took<br />
place between donors and recipient governments to def<strong>in</strong>e what such policy<br />
re<strong>for</strong>m would consist <strong>of</strong>, and to ensure that aid would be committed and<br />
disbursed <strong>in</strong> support <strong>of</strong> the agreed-upon policy re<strong>for</strong>ms. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, unlike<br />
what donors did <strong>in</strong> Asia <strong>in</strong> earlier periods, <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa they did<br />
not l<strong>in</strong>k the implementation <strong>of</strong> policy re<strong>for</strong>m programmes to their provision<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>eign assistance, despite their statements that they would concentrate<br />
their aid on the ‘re<strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g’ countries. 2 In the 1990s, donors were not<br />
be successful <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g recipient governments to re<strong>for</strong>m their policies as<br />
long as they were not firm <strong>in</strong> their reactions to shortfalls <strong>in</strong> policy per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
3 By the end <strong>of</strong> the 1990s the World Bank felt it had to admonish<br />
donors to focus their aid more on ‘re<strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g’ governments <strong>in</strong> Africa, imply<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a severe criticism <strong>of</strong> bilateral aid policy <strong>in</strong> the 1990s. However, the Bank’s<br />
statements rang hollow, as not <strong>in</strong>frequently – and <strong>in</strong>ter alia <strong>in</strong> Zambia <strong>in</strong> the<br />
1990s – the World Bank itself let commitment and disbursement pressures<br />
prevail over policy per<strong>for</strong>mance criteria. Fortunately, many donors now feel<br />
that new approaches are needed to confront the lagg<strong>in</strong>g development per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
<strong>of</strong> countries where <strong>in</strong>adequacies <strong>of</strong> economic policy and governance<br />
are key obstacles to progress.<br />
Few people would deny that the key to development progress <strong>in</strong> sub-<br />
Saharan Africa lies <strong>in</strong> the design and vigorous application <strong>of</strong> strongly<br />
domestically-owned policy re<strong>for</strong>m programmes, supported by adequate levels<br />
and modalities <strong>of</strong> external aid. Few people would deny also that the <strong>in</strong>itiative<br />
<strong>for</strong> policy re<strong>for</strong>m <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa must come from with<strong>in</strong>, and<br />
that a strong recipient government commitment to economic growth and<br />
poverty reduction is essential <strong>for</strong> the achievement <strong>of</strong> development success.<br />
On the donors’ side, the key question now is how to focus aid programmes<br />
2 Inter alia <strong>in</strong> the meet<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the Special Programme <strong>for</strong> Africa as well as <strong>in</strong> the DAC/OECD.<br />
3 This <strong>of</strong>ten happened because <strong>of</strong> donor feel<strong>in</strong>gs that the immediate alleviation <strong>of</strong> poverty<br />
commanded the highest priority; or because <strong>of</strong> non-economic policy considerations.<br />
79