15.08.2013 Views

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annex 2<br />

November 2012<br />

<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />

Q14: Do you agree with our approach permitting AIF depositaries<br />

to be in <strong>the</strong> same group as <strong>the</strong> AIFM so long as Directive<br />

requirements are met?<br />

Q15: What additional safeguards, if any, should <strong>the</strong>re be to ensure<br />

effective management <strong>of</strong> conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest, especially in<br />

relation to custody <strong>of</strong> AIF assets?<br />

Q16: Do you agree with our approach requiring UK firms providing<br />

depositary services under Article 36 to hold a Part IV<br />

permission to be an AIF depositary?<br />

Q17: Do you agree that EEA credit institutions should be allowed<br />

to act as depositary to UK AIFs? If you expect to be an AIFM<br />

<strong>of</strong> UK AIFs from 2013, would you consider using such a firm<br />

as depositary?<br />

Q18: Should authorised funds be excluded from this arrangement?<br />

Q19: Do you agree with our assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

requirements for PE AIF depositaries?<br />

Q20: Do you agree with our analysis <strong>of</strong> costs and benefits?<br />

Financial Services Authority A2:3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!