15.08.2013 Views

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />

Transitional arrangements for appointing non-UK depositaries<br />

Annex X<br />

9.45 The Directive allows flexibility for a credit institution that is authorised and has its<br />

registered <strong>of</strong>fice in <strong>the</strong> EU to act as depositary for AIFs established in any EEA State, for a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> four years until July 2017. We propose to implement this so that UK AIFs (o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than authorised funds) may appoint an EEA (non-UK) credit institution in this role during<br />

<strong>the</strong> transitional period. We believe that this may be helpful to AIFMs <strong>of</strong> UK AIFs, as we do<br />

not yet know how many UK firms will be ready to act as AIF depositaries in <strong>the</strong> early days<br />

after implementation.<br />

9.46 We propose to exclude authorised funds (NURS and QIS) from this arrangement because<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are subject to a UK-specific regime that will be unfamiliar to non-UK depositaries.<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong>y already have a depositary and (unless <strong>the</strong> existing depositary withdraws from <strong>the</strong><br />

market) <strong>the</strong> AIFM should not need to appoint a new one to become AIFMD-compliant.<br />

Even if a new appointment were necessary, we do not think a compelling case can be made<br />

that switching to a non-UK depositary for a limited period and <strong>the</strong>n switching back again<br />

to a UK firm, when <strong>the</strong> transitional provision expires, would be in <strong>the</strong> best interests <strong>of</strong><br />

investors as long as <strong>the</strong>re are alternative service providers in <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />

Q17: Do you agree that EEA credit institutions should be allowed<br />

to act as depositary to UK AIFs? If you expect to be an AIFM<br />

<strong>of</strong> UK AIFs from 2013, would you consider using such a firm<br />

as depositary?<br />

Q18: Should authorised funds be excluded from this arrangement?<br />

78 Financial Services Authority November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!