CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
Transitional arrangements for appointing non-UK depositaries<br />
Annex X<br />
9.45 The Directive allows flexibility for a credit institution that is authorised and has its<br />
registered <strong>of</strong>fice in <strong>the</strong> EU to act as depositary for AIFs established in any EEA State, for a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> four years until July 2017. We propose to implement this so that UK AIFs (o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than authorised funds) may appoint an EEA (non-UK) credit institution in this role during<br />
<strong>the</strong> transitional period. We believe that this may be helpful to AIFMs <strong>of</strong> UK AIFs, as we do<br />
not yet know how many UK firms will be ready to act as AIF depositaries in <strong>the</strong> early days<br />
after implementation.<br />
9.46 We propose to exclude authorised funds (NURS and QIS) from this arrangement because<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are subject to a UK-specific regime that will be unfamiliar to non-UK depositaries.<br />
Also, <strong>the</strong>y already have a depositary and (unless <strong>the</strong> existing depositary withdraws from <strong>the</strong><br />
market) <strong>the</strong> AIFM should not need to appoint a new one to become AIFMD-compliant.<br />
Even if a new appointment were necessary, we do not think a compelling case can be made<br />
that switching to a non-UK depositary for a limited period and <strong>the</strong>n switching back again<br />
to a UK firm, when <strong>the</strong> transitional provision expires, would be in <strong>the</strong> best interests <strong>of</strong><br />
investors as long as <strong>the</strong>re are alternative service providers in <strong>the</strong> UK.<br />
Q17: Do you agree that EEA credit institutions should be allowed<br />
to act as depositary to UK AIFs? If you expect to be an AIFM<br />
<strong>of</strong> UK AIFs from 2013, would you consider using such a firm<br />
as depositary?<br />
Q18: Should authorised funds be excluded from this arrangement?<br />
78 Financial Services Authority November 2012