15.08.2013 Views

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />

operator <strong>of</strong> a CIS (that is an AIF) is authorised to manage that AIF, <strong>the</strong> operator will no<br />

longer need to hold a separate permission to operate <strong>the</strong> CIS – it will cease to be a<br />

regulated activity as long as <strong>the</strong>re is an authorised person acting as <strong>the</strong> AIFM.<br />

Annex X<br />

4.6 The activity <strong>of</strong> establishing and operating a CIS will be retained, but will only need to be<br />

held where a firm operates a CIS that is nei<strong>the</strong>r an AIF nor a UCITS. The activity <strong>of</strong> sole<br />

director <strong>of</strong> an OEIC will be abolished, as <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> managing an AIF or a UCITS will<br />

replace it entirely.<br />

4.7 Managing an AIF will comprise all activities listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directive, if <strong>the</strong> AIFM<br />

itself is appointed to perform <strong>the</strong>m (whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it <strong>the</strong>n delegates <strong>the</strong> performance to a<br />

third party). The AIFM will always be responsible for <strong>the</strong> investment management<br />

functions, but (where an AIF has an external AIFM) <strong>the</strong> governing body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIF may<br />

appoint ano<strong>the</strong>r person to perform some or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities listed in paragraph 2 <strong>of</strong><br />

Annex I. If it does, that person will not need to be authorised to manage an AIF, but may<br />

need to be authorised to perform ano<strong>the</strong>r regulated activity (for example, if <strong>the</strong>y effect <strong>the</strong><br />

issue and redemption <strong>of</strong> units or shares). 25<br />

4.8 An AIFM will not need to hold separate permissions for o<strong>the</strong>r regulated activities (such as<br />

managing investments) that it carries out ‘in connection with, or for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

managing <strong>the</strong> assets <strong>of</strong> AIFs and UCITS’. This covers core activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIF or UCITS scheme, such as making investment decisions and dealing<br />

in securities or o<strong>the</strong>r assets, but not activities such as <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> individual<br />

portfolios where <strong>the</strong>y happen to be carried out by <strong>the</strong> same firm.<br />

4.9 An AIFM that is responsible for some or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities listed in Annex I paragraph 2<br />

(for example, dealing with customer enquiries) will <strong>the</strong>refore be carrying on a regulated<br />

activity when providing any <strong>of</strong> those services, even though <strong>the</strong> service would not be a<br />

regulated activity if carried out by ano<strong>the</strong>r person. However, categorising <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong><br />

an AIFM in this way provides clarity and certainty for AIFMs wishing to use <strong>the</strong> single<br />

market passport to provide AIF management services in o<strong>the</strong>r Member States.<br />

Authorisation <strong>of</strong> AIFMs<br />

4.10 A full scope UK AIFM will need to be authorised under Part IV <strong>of</strong> FSMA by <strong>the</strong> FCA.<br />

Firms that already hold a Part IV permission to carry on a regulated activity and consider<br />

<strong>the</strong>y should be authorised as an AIFM, may seek a variation <strong>of</strong> permission (VoP).<br />

4.11 We are considering whe<strong>the</strong>r we might apply a ‘grandfa<strong>the</strong>ring’ process to VoPs for those<br />

firms currently holding <strong>the</strong> permissions <strong>of</strong> operating a CIS or acting as sole director <strong>of</strong> an<br />

OEIC, and will tell firms in due course what we intend to do. Some firms with <strong>the</strong> Part IV<br />

permission <strong>of</strong> managing investments may decide <strong>the</strong>y should also be authorised as AIFMs,<br />

25 A closed-ended investment company that is internally managed may be authorised as its own AIFM, but it will not be an authorised<br />

CIS under Part XVII <strong>of</strong> FSMA.<br />

28 Financial Services Authority November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!