CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
operator <strong>of</strong> a CIS (that is an AIF) is authorised to manage that AIF, <strong>the</strong> operator will no<br />
longer need to hold a separate permission to operate <strong>the</strong> CIS – it will cease to be a<br />
regulated activity as long as <strong>the</strong>re is an authorised person acting as <strong>the</strong> AIFM.<br />
Annex X<br />
4.6 The activity <strong>of</strong> establishing and operating a CIS will be retained, but will only need to be<br />
held where a firm operates a CIS that is nei<strong>the</strong>r an AIF nor a UCITS. The activity <strong>of</strong> sole<br />
director <strong>of</strong> an OEIC will be abolished, as <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong> managing an AIF or a UCITS will<br />
replace it entirely.<br />
4.7 Managing an AIF will comprise all activities listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directive, if <strong>the</strong> AIFM<br />
itself is appointed to perform <strong>the</strong>m (whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it <strong>the</strong>n delegates <strong>the</strong> performance to a<br />
third party). The AIFM will always be responsible for <strong>the</strong> investment management<br />
functions, but (where an AIF has an external AIFM) <strong>the</strong> governing body <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIF may<br />
appoint ano<strong>the</strong>r person to perform some or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities listed in paragraph 2 <strong>of</strong><br />
Annex I. If it does, that person will not need to be authorised to manage an AIF, but may<br />
need to be authorised to perform ano<strong>the</strong>r regulated activity (for example, if <strong>the</strong>y effect <strong>the</strong><br />
issue and redemption <strong>of</strong> units or shares). 25<br />
4.8 An AIFM will not need to hold separate permissions for o<strong>the</strong>r regulated activities (such as<br />
managing investments) that it carries out ‘in connection with, or for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong><br />
managing <strong>the</strong> assets <strong>of</strong> AIFs and UCITS’. This covers core activities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIF or UCITS scheme, such as making investment decisions and dealing<br />
in securities or o<strong>the</strong>r assets, but not activities such as <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> individual<br />
portfolios where <strong>the</strong>y happen to be carried out by <strong>the</strong> same firm.<br />
4.9 An AIFM that is responsible for some or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> activities listed in Annex I paragraph 2<br />
(for example, dealing with customer enquiries) will <strong>the</strong>refore be carrying on a regulated<br />
activity when providing any <strong>of</strong> those services, even though <strong>the</strong> service would not be a<br />
regulated activity if carried out by ano<strong>the</strong>r person. However, categorising <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong><br />
an AIFM in this way provides clarity and certainty for AIFMs wishing to use <strong>the</strong> single<br />
market passport to provide AIF management services in o<strong>the</strong>r Member States.<br />
Authorisation <strong>of</strong> AIFMs<br />
4.10 A full scope UK AIFM will need to be authorised under Part IV <strong>of</strong> FSMA by <strong>the</strong> FCA.<br />
Firms that already hold a Part IV permission to carry on a regulated activity and consider<br />
<strong>the</strong>y should be authorised as an AIFM, may seek a variation <strong>of</strong> permission (VoP).<br />
4.11 We are considering whe<strong>the</strong>r we might apply a ‘grandfa<strong>the</strong>ring’ process to VoPs for those<br />
firms currently holding <strong>the</strong> permissions <strong>of</strong> operating a CIS or acting as sole director <strong>of</strong> an<br />
OEIC, and will tell firms in due course what we intend to do. Some firms with <strong>the</strong> Part IV<br />
permission <strong>of</strong> managing investments may decide <strong>the</strong>y should also be authorised as AIFMs,<br />
25 A closed-ended investment company that is internally managed may be authorised as its own AIFM, but it will not be an authorised<br />
CIS under Part XVII <strong>of</strong> FSMA.<br />
28 Financial Services Authority November 2012