CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annex 1<br />
November 2012<br />
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
• Ernst & Young (2012) ‘AIFMD: get ready for European depositary reform’. 4<br />
• The European commission’s impact assessment from 2009. 5<br />
10. The FSA’s preliminary firm survey was sent to a sample <strong>of</strong> potential AIFMs in April 2012.<br />
It outlined at a high level <strong>the</strong> requirements in <strong>the</strong> Level 1 Directive and <strong>the</strong> draft Level 2<br />
Regulation, and asked firms to estimate costs and assess business model impacts. From <strong>the</strong> 36<br />
firms that responded, 22 firms expected to have UK AIFMs within <strong>the</strong>ir group structures and<br />
to be above <strong>the</strong> AIFMD Article 3(2) thresholds. These AIFMs managed around £179.5bn<br />
worth <strong>of</strong> assets in AIFs. O<strong>the</strong>r respondents ei<strong>the</strong>r had not completely filled out <strong>the</strong> survey,<br />
expected to be below <strong>the</strong> Article 3(2) thresholds, or did not expect to have UK AIFMs.<br />
11. Almost all respondents found it difficult to provide meaningful and detailed cost estimates,<br />
as, at <strong>the</strong> time we were surveying firms, <strong>the</strong>re was still uncertainty about <strong>the</strong> content and<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Level 2 requirements.<br />
12. Unfortunately, we received too few responses for <strong>the</strong>se to be representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
highly heterogeneous, population <strong>of</strong> funds to be managed by future AIFMs. We <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
have not quantitatively assessed <strong>the</strong> impact on <strong>the</strong> specific types <strong>of</strong> AIFMs.<br />
Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> firms affected<br />
13. AIFMD will directly affect managers <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> AIFs, including UCIS covering<br />
hedge funds, private equity, venture capital and real estate funds; investment trusts; NURS<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> investment funds.<br />
14. However, it is not yet fully determined which types <strong>of</strong> AIFMs will be in scope <strong>of</strong> AIFMD.<br />
ESMA is currently developing technical standards on this matter, and as <strong>the</strong> Level 2<br />
Regulation has not yet been finalised, assessing <strong>the</strong> AIFMD perimeter is beyond <strong>the</strong> scope<br />
<strong>of</strong> this CP and CBA.<br />
15. The AIFMD will also affect o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> firms that provide services to AIFMs, predominantly:<br />
• depositaries;<br />
• prime brokers;<br />
• valuation agents; and<br />
• o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>admin</strong>istrators and service providers.<br />
4 The Ernst & Young report can be accessed here: www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/AIFMD_-_prepare_for_European_depositary_<br />
reform/$FILE/AIFMD_20March2012.pdf<br />
5 European Commission’s impact assessment (http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/investment/docs/alternative_investments/fund_<br />
managers_impact_assessment.pdf) and <strong>the</strong> CRA report (www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/o<strong>the</strong>r/Impact_<strong>of</strong>_AIFM_Directive.pdf)<br />
Financial Services Authority A1:3