CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
Annex X<br />
7.46 The Level 2 Regulation is expected to require an AIFM, as part <strong>of</strong> its risk management<br />
systems, to establish and implement quantitative and/or qualitative risk limits for each AIF<br />
it manages. We expect <strong>the</strong>se risk limits will need to be aligned with <strong>the</strong> risk pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> each<br />
AIF as disclosed to investors under FUND 3.2.5R. The limits must take into account all<br />
relevant risks, and at least those risks set out in <strong>the</strong> Level 2 Regulation.<br />
7.47 Where an AIFM sets purely qualitative limits, we would expect it to justify this approach<br />
to us. As noted in DP12/1, this justification might include <strong>the</strong> reasons why it would be<br />
difficult to set meaningful quantitative risk limits or why using quantitative risk limits<br />
might not be in <strong>the</strong> best interests <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIF’s investors. We think that in setting only<br />
qualitative risk limits, <strong>the</strong> intention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIFM should not be to seek additional<br />
flexibility to take on more risk with <strong>the</strong> aim <strong>of</strong> increasing <strong>the</strong> potential investment returns.<br />
AIFMs managing leverage risk<br />
7.48 The Directive requires an AIFM to set a maximum level <strong>of</strong> leverage for each AIF under<br />
management. Our draft rules in FUND 3.7 will transpose what will be new requirements<br />
for AIFMs using leverage in <strong>the</strong> funds <strong>the</strong>y manage. FUND 3.7.7R will require <strong>the</strong> AIFM<br />
to set out <strong>the</strong> extent to which its leveraging arrangements give <strong>the</strong> prime broker (or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
counterparty) <strong>the</strong> right to re-use <strong>the</strong> collateral or grant a guarantee. In doing this it must<br />
take account <strong>of</strong> certain considerations, including <strong>the</strong> investment strategy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIF, <strong>the</strong><br />
sources <strong>of</strong> leverage and systemic risk implications.<br />
7.49 FUND 3.7.8R requires AIFMs to demonstrate to <strong>the</strong> FCA that <strong>the</strong> leverage limits <strong>of</strong> each<br />
AIF are reasonable and that <strong>the</strong>y comply with those limits at all times. We explain this<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r in paragraphs 8.2.4 and 8.25.<br />
7.50 An AIFM making changes to <strong>the</strong> maximum level <strong>of</strong> leverage must in future disclose this to<br />
investors (FUND 3.2.6R). In DP12/1 we asked respondents what constituted a ‘material<br />
change’ for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this rule. 74 However, we now expect <strong>the</strong> Level 2 Regulation to<br />
stipulate that this applies to all changes to <strong>the</strong> maximum level <strong>of</strong> leverage.<br />
7.51 Respondents to DP12/1 also asked whe<strong>the</strong>r AIFMs had to disclose <strong>the</strong> information before<br />
or after making <strong>the</strong> change and whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y had to obtain prior approval from investors.<br />
The Level 2 Regulation is expected to require <strong>the</strong> information to be provided without<br />
undue delay. This gives AIFMs <strong>the</strong> flexibility to change <strong>the</strong> maximum level <strong>of</strong> leverage<br />
without prior communication, but ensures that investors will be informed on a timely basis.<br />
Any stricter notification or approval requirements in an AIF’s prospectus should still be<br />
adhered to, and specific rules for NURS and QIS will continue to apply.<br />
74 Question 15 DP 12/1.<br />
56 Financial Services Authority November 2012