CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
Costs<br />
Direct costs to <strong>the</strong> FSA and <strong>the</strong> FCA<br />
Annex 1<br />
X<br />
16. We estimate <strong>the</strong> one-<strong>of</strong>f costs <strong>of</strong> implementing <strong>the</strong> AIFMD to be around £5m. These cover<br />
staff costs and costs <strong>of</strong> anticipated systems developments following <strong>the</strong> high-level gap<br />
analysis on <strong>the</strong> back <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> initial interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directive.<br />
17. Additional supervisory staff may be needed on an ongoing basis due to <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong><br />
number <strong>of</strong> regulated firms. However, most potential AIFMs are already authorised by <strong>the</strong> FSA,<br />
so we do not expect a significant number <strong>of</strong> new managers, ei<strong>the</strong>r start-ups or new entities<br />
consolidating previous businesses. In particular, investment managers <strong>of</strong> NURS, QIS, UCIS<br />
and externally managed investment trusts are already authorised and supervised by <strong>the</strong> FSA.<br />
Compliance costs to AIFMs<br />
18. Incremental compliance costs arising from <strong>the</strong> changes to parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Handbook are dealt<br />
with on a topic-by-topic basis in paragraphs 20 to 65.<br />
19. Table 1 gives an overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ranges <strong>of</strong> cost estimates provided by firms. 6 The fact that<br />
cost ranges are very wide reflects that <strong>the</strong> impact will vary greatly across <strong>the</strong> industry. In<br />
this and o<strong>the</strong>r cost summary tables, ‘£0’ covers cases where firms indicated that <strong>the</strong>y will<br />
not incur costs or where firms thought <strong>the</strong>se costs are likely to be <strong>of</strong> minimal significance.<br />
Also, not all costs were quantified in <strong>the</strong> CBA survey, and <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following<br />
requirements are discussed only qualitatively:<br />
• securitisation requirements;<br />
• liquid asset requirements; and<br />
• requirements for depositaries.<br />
6 These estimates cover both staff costs and non-staff costs, such as costs <strong>of</strong> updating electronic systems. To quantify staff costs we<br />
assumed average annual salary <strong>of</strong> £50,000 plus 30% overheads.<br />
A1:4 Financial Services Authority November 2012