CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
5. This CBA is structured as follows:<br />
• our approach to <strong>the</strong> CBA;<br />
• overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> firms affected;<br />
• costs;<br />
• market impacts; and<br />
• benefits.<br />
Our approach to <strong>the</strong> CBA<br />
Annex 1<br />
X<br />
The relevant baseline<br />
6. The CBA has to make an appropriate comparison between <strong>the</strong> overall position if <strong>the</strong> proposed<br />
regulatory changes are applied and <strong>the</strong> overall position if <strong>the</strong>y are not (i.e. <strong>the</strong> baseline).<br />
7. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> AIFMD, we consider <strong>the</strong> appropriate baseline to be <strong>the</strong> status quo: <strong>the</strong> current<br />
regulation that <strong>the</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> firms are subject to (or <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> it) and current<br />
business practice. Where <strong>the</strong>re is discretion in AIFMD for <strong>the</strong> FCA to apply different rules<br />
(e.g. reporting, capital, depositary requirements), we also consider <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
additional requirements imposed by <strong>the</strong> FCA.<br />
8. This CBA does not assess <strong>the</strong> impact on small firms falling below <strong>the</strong> thresholds in<br />
Article 3(2) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Directive, as <strong>the</strong>se impacts will depend on <strong>the</strong> forthcoming Treasury<br />
decisions following consultation. We also do not assess <strong>the</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transitional<br />
provisions, though <strong>the</strong>se are likely to reduce firms’ one-<strong>of</strong>f compliance costs.<br />
Data sources and level <strong>of</strong> analysis<br />
9. The CBA is based on internal FSA analysis, <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> a firm survey sent to potential<br />
AIFMs, discussions with stakeholders and input from our policy and supervisory experts.<br />
We are grateful to all who contributed to <strong>the</strong> CBA. We also draw on publicly available<br />
analysis, mainly <strong>the</strong> following reports:<br />
• Charles River Associates (2009) ‘Impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed AIFMD Directive across<br />
Europe’. 2 The CRA report was commissioned by <strong>the</strong> FSA.<br />
• Deloitte (2012) ‘Responding to <strong>the</strong> new reality: <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers<br />
Directive Survey’. 3<br />
2 The CRA report can be accessed here: www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/o<strong>the</strong>r/Impact_<strong>of</strong>_AIFM_Directive.pdf<br />
3 The Deloitte report can be accessed here: www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/<br />
Financial%20Services/uk-fs-aifmd-survey-responding-new-reality.pdf<br />
A1:2 Financial Services Authority November 2012