15.08.2013 Views

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />

Annex X<br />

7.67 AIFMs will be required to have remuneration policies that promote effective risk<br />

management, while at <strong>the</strong> same time allowing risk-taking commensurate with each AIF’s<br />

investment objectives. 87 These remuneration policies will need to apply to staff whose<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional activities have a material impact on <strong>the</strong> risk pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIFM or <strong>the</strong> AIFs<br />

under management. These staff categories will include senior management, risk takers,<br />

control functions and any employees who receive total remuneration, taking <strong>the</strong>m into <strong>the</strong><br />

same remuneration bracket as senior management and risk takers. 88<br />

7.68 AIFM remuneration policies will need to cover elements such as:<br />

• performance-related pay;<br />

• guaranteed variable remuneration;<br />

• balance between fixed and variable components <strong>of</strong> total remuneration;<br />

• remuneration in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> units and shares in <strong>the</strong> AIFs under management;<br />

• a mandatory deferral period <strong>of</strong> at least three to five years, unless <strong>the</strong> life cycle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

AIF is shorter; and<br />

• clawback <strong>of</strong> remuneration for under-performance.<br />

Proportionality<br />

7.69 The Directive states that <strong>the</strong> remuneration principles will apply to AIFMs ‘in a way and to<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent that is appropriate to <strong>the</strong>ir size, internal organisation and <strong>the</strong> nature, scope and<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir activities’.<br />

7.70 Several respondents to DP12/1 asked how proportionality would apply to an AIFM’s<br />

remuneration policy, and whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re would be differences with <strong>the</strong> proportionality<br />

framework in our existing Remuneration Code. 89 In certain circumstances AIFMs may be<br />

subject to both AIFMD and <strong>the</strong> Remuneration Code. Respondents to DP12/1 identified this<br />

potential overlap as an area <strong>of</strong> concern because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> likelihood <strong>of</strong> increased<br />

<strong>admin</strong>istrative burdens and <strong>the</strong> difficulties <strong>of</strong> adopting a group-wide policy that complies<br />

with both regimes ins<strong>of</strong>ar as <strong>the</strong>y may diverge.<br />

7.71 The extent to which proportionality may be applied to an AIFM’s remuneration policies is<br />

still being considered by ESMA. Once <strong>the</strong> ESMA guidelines are finalised, we intend to<br />

establish a proportionality framework specific to firms within <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> AIFMD,<br />

incorporating European requirements and guidelines. The framework for AIFMs will take<br />

account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Remuneration Code in SYSC 19A, but is likely to differ from it in structure.<br />

87 SYSC 19B.1.2R. See Article 13(1) AIFMD.<br />

88 SYSC 19B.1.3R. See Article 13(1) AIFMD.<br />

89 Question 9 <strong>of</strong> DP12/1.<br />

60 Financial Services Authority November 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!