CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Annex 4<br />
November 2012<br />
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
11. In <strong>the</strong> areas where we have discretion, we have calibrated our rules to <strong>the</strong> risks that <strong>the</strong><br />
different activities pose bearing in mind <strong>the</strong> impact on competition.<br />
Compatibility with <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> good regulation<br />
12. Section 2(3) <strong>of</strong> FSMA requires that, in carrying out our general functions, we have regard<br />
to <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> good regulation.<br />
The need to use our resources in <strong>the</strong> most efficient and<br />
economic way<br />
13. This is our first Consultation Paper transposing AIFMD in <strong>the</strong> UK. This approach allows<br />
us to consult in a timely manner, providing as much clarity as possible in preparation for<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> AIFMD. We are consulting where we have sufficient certainty to do so –<br />
on <strong>the</strong> Level 1 Directive principles. A second planned consultation provides an opportunity<br />
to determine policy options following European policy developments. Our approach to<br />
implementation is designed to ensure that we use our resources efficiently. This includes<br />
using ‘intelligent copy-out’ wherever appropriate, i.e. adhering to <strong>the</strong> wording <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Directive as closely as possible.<br />
The responsibility <strong>of</strong> those who manage <strong>the</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong><br />
authorised persons<br />
14. Our proposals put responsibility on firms and <strong>the</strong>ir management to ensure that conduct<br />
and prudential standards such as valuation, transparency reporting, remuneration policies,<br />
etc. are properly followed.<br />
The principle that a burden or restriction which is imposed should<br />
be proportionate to <strong>the</strong> benefits<br />
15. Although AIFMD is mostly maximum harmonising, in <strong>the</strong> few areas where we have <strong>the</strong> option<br />
to make a discretionary decision we have taken into account <strong>the</strong> proportionality principle.<br />
The desirability <strong>of</strong> facilitating innovation<br />
16. Our proposals might constrain certain AIF structures such as those without depositaries, or<br />
with significant reliance on investment management delegation, etc. with a resulting impact on<br />
Financial Services Authority A4:3