CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
5<br />
Prudential requirements for<br />
fund managers<br />
5.1 This chapter covers <strong>the</strong> prudential regime for all types <strong>of</strong> AIFM, including capital<br />
requirements, pr<strong>of</strong>essional negligence risks, <strong>the</strong> liquid assets requirement and reporting<br />
matters. It also covers certain changes to our prudential rules affecting UCITS<br />
management companies.<br />
Capital, PII and reporting requirements for AIFMs and UCITS<br />
management companies<br />
5.2 A firm currently authorised by <strong>the</strong> FSA to manage AIFs and/or UCITS must comply with<br />
<strong>the</strong> capital requirements <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following:<br />
• UPRU if it only operates UCITS (and o<strong>the</strong>r CIS) as a UCITS firm;<br />
Annex X<br />
• GENPRU and BIPRU if it also provides investment services under MiFID as a BIPRU<br />
investment firm; or<br />
• IPRU (INV) Chapter 5 if it only operates CIS outside <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive<br />
(and IPRU (INV) Chapter 9 also if it is an exempt CAD firm).<br />
5.3 The capital requirements <strong>of</strong> AIFMD and <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive are broadly <strong>the</strong> same, with<br />
both being based on funds under management and expenditure and <strong>the</strong> same types <strong>of</strong><br />
capital instrument allowed. As we explained in Chapter 4, a firm that is authorised to<br />
manage an AIF may also manage UCITS (if it has permission to do so). So we intend to<br />
transpose <strong>the</strong> capital and pr<strong>of</strong>essional indemnity insurance (PII) requirements <strong>of</strong> AIFMD<br />
alongside those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive and use common terms to apply to both types <strong>of</strong><br />
manager, where possible. This means that both UCITS management companies and AIFMs<br />
will need to consider <strong>the</strong> prudential proposals in this paper.<br />
<strong>32</strong> Financial Services Authority November 2012