CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
November 2012<br />
Delegation<br />
Delegation by authorised AIFMs<br />
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
7.52 The Directive aims to ensure that, where AIFMs delegate <strong>the</strong>ir AIFM functions, <strong>the</strong>y only<br />
do so subject to certain conditions. 75 In order to ensure <strong>the</strong>y are compliant with our new<br />
rules, AIFMs will need to review <strong>the</strong>ir current delegation arrangements against <strong>the</strong><br />
criteria mentioned below, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> delegation is done intra-group or involves<br />
independent third parties.<br />
7.53 Where <strong>the</strong> AIFM proposes to delegate any investment management function to a firm<br />
outside <strong>the</strong> EEA, it must in future obtain prior approval from us if that firm is not<br />
authorised or registered in its jurisdiction and is not subject to supervision.<br />
7.54 We intend to transpose delegation requirements in FUND 3.10. These new rules will<br />
require AIFMs to notify us <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed delegation before <strong>the</strong> arrangements take<br />
effect. 76 The arrangements must, for example, meet conditions such as:<br />
• <strong>the</strong> entire delegation structure is justifiable on objective reasons;<br />
• <strong>the</strong> proposed delegate has sufficient resources, and is properly qualified;<br />
• <strong>the</strong> delegate performing investment management functions is authorised or registered,<br />
and subject to supervision 77 ; and<br />
• in cases where <strong>the</strong> delegate is located outside <strong>the</strong> EEA, <strong>the</strong>re is cooperation between <strong>the</strong><br />
FSA and <strong>the</strong> delegate’s supervisory authority.<br />
7.55 The functions covered by <strong>the</strong> delegation provisions are specified in <strong>the</strong> Directive. We<br />
propose to add <strong>the</strong> defined term ‘AIFM management functions’ to <strong>the</strong> Glossary to cover<br />
this concept.<br />
7.56 The Directive also contains rules on sub-delegation and restriction on delegating functions<br />
to <strong>the</strong> depositary or where <strong>the</strong>re may be a conflict <strong>of</strong> interest with <strong>the</strong> AIFM or <strong>the</strong> AIF. We<br />
intend to transpose <strong>the</strong>se requirements in FUND 3.10.4R to 3.10.6R.<br />
7.57 The Level 1 requirements will be supplemented by more detailed requirements in <strong>the</strong> Level 2<br />
Regulation. We expect it to require that <strong>the</strong> proposed delegation arrangements be subject to<br />
a written agreement, and that <strong>the</strong> delegate has proper business continuity planning.<br />
Supervisory cooperation arrangements with non-EEA authorities<br />
7.58 Cooperation between <strong>the</strong> FCA and <strong>the</strong> supervisory authorities <strong>of</strong> a jurisdiction where a<br />
non-EEA delegate is located will be ensured when we have signed a cooperation<br />
75 Article 20 AIFMD.<br />
76 FUND 3.10.2R.<br />
77 The Directive also allows an exemption from this condition with <strong>the</strong> prior approval <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> competent authorities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> home<br />
Member State <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> AIFM. Article 20(1)(c). This exemption will be transposed by <strong>the</strong> Treasury.<br />
Financial Services Authority 57