15.08.2013 Views

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

November 2012<br />

<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />

Directive correctly. We do not consider that all non-AIFMD rules applying to QIS should<br />

be removed. This would leave no meaningful distinction between a QIS and an unregulated<br />

CIS in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir regulatory obligations, and we think that granting authorised status to<br />

a fund should bring with it a higher standard <strong>of</strong> investor protection.<br />

Alignment between retail AIFs and UCITS schemes<br />

2.28 In DP12/1, we also asked whe<strong>the</strong>r we should consider aligning requirements for UCITS<br />

management companies and AIFMs where <strong>the</strong> Directives contain common requirements. A<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> respondents broadly supported this idea, although some thought it would damage<br />

competition if additional AIFMD-based requirements were imposed on UCITS schemes, or if<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional-only funds were also subjected to retail investor protection measures.<br />

2.29 We are mindful <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government’s stated intention to avoid ‘gold-plating’ when<br />

implementing Directives, as well as <strong>the</strong> burden on and costs for firms <strong>of</strong> having to make<br />

operational changes over and above what is strictly necessary. So we have decided not to<br />

try to align <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two directives in our Handbook beyond what is already<br />

in place for authorised funds. We may reconsider this issue in <strong>the</strong> future, when we know<br />

<strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Commission’s proposals for fur<strong>the</strong>r changes to <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive.<br />

Non-UCITS recognised schemes<br />

2.30 The Treasury will consult in due course on <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> non-UK funds (o<strong>the</strong>r than EEA<br />

UCITS) that can be promoted to <strong>the</strong> general public. At present, such funds may only be<br />

promoted if <strong>the</strong>y are recognised schemes under sections 270 or 272 <strong>of</strong> FSMA. We propose<br />

to deal with any resulting changes to our rules and guidance ei<strong>the</strong>r in CP2 or a subsequent<br />

consultation paper.<br />

Transposing AIFMD into <strong>the</strong> Handbook<br />

2.31 We intend to transpose AIFMD requirements into <strong>the</strong> Handbook in <strong>the</strong> way we explained<br />

in DP12/1. We said we would, where appropriate, distribute Directive requirements<br />

between <strong>the</strong> most suitable parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Handbook; for example, rules for systems and<br />

controls in SYSC and rules for conduct <strong>of</strong> business in COBS. At <strong>the</strong> same time, we<br />

proposed a new sourcebook to replace COLL, to accommodate both AIFMD and expected<br />

future changes to <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive.<br />

2.<strong>32</strong> Some respondents to DP12/1 did not agree with this suggested approach and asked instead for<br />

COLL to be retained and a new, separate sourcebook to be created for o<strong>the</strong>r funds and fund<br />

managers subject to AIFMD. The reasons <strong>the</strong>y gave were convenience and ease <strong>of</strong> reference for<br />

firms managing only authorised funds; it would be less disruptive to <strong>the</strong>m than introducing a<br />

single comprehensive funds sourcebook under <strong>the</strong> banner <strong>of</strong> AIFMD implementation.<br />

Financial Services Authority 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!