CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
November 2012<br />
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
Directive correctly. We do not consider that all non-AIFMD rules applying to QIS should<br />
be removed. This would leave no meaningful distinction between a QIS and an unregulated<br />
CIS in terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir regulatory obligations, and we think that granting authorised status to<br />
a fund should bring with it a higher standard <strong>of</strong> investor protection.<br />
Alignment between retail AIFs and UCITS schemes<br />
2.28 In DP12/1, we also asked whe<strong>the</strong>r we should consider aligning requirements for UCITS<br />
management companies and AIFMs where <strong>the</strong> Directives contain common requirements. A<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> respondents broadly supported this idea, although some thought it would damage<br />
competition if additional AIFMD-based requirements were imposed on UCITS schemes, or if<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional-only funds were also subjected to retail investor protection measures.<br />
2.29 We are mindful <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> government’s stated intention to avoid ‘gold-plating’ when<br />
implementing Directives, as well as <strong>the</strong> burden on and costs for firms <strong>of</strong> having to make<br />
operational changes over and above what is strictly necessary. So we have decided not to<br />
try to align <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two directives in our Handbook beyond what is already<br />
in place for authorised funds. We may reconsider this issue in <strong>the</strong> future, when we know<br />
<strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Commission’s proposals for fur<strong>the</strong>r changes to <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive.<br />
Non-UCITS recognised schemes<br />
2.30 The Treasury will consult in due course on <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> non-UK funds (o<strong>the</strong>r than EEA<br />
UCITS) that can be promoted to <strong>the</strong> general public. At present, such funds may only be<br />
promoted if <strong>the</strong>y are recognised schemes under sections 270 or 272 <strong>of</strong> FSMA. We propose<br />
to deal with any resulting changes to our rules and guidance ei<strong>the</strong>r in CP2 or a subsequent<br />
consultation paper.<br />
Transposing AIFMD into <strong>the</strong> Handbook<br />
2.31 We intend to transpose AIFMD requirements into <strong>the</strong> Handbook in <strong>the</strong> way we explained<br />
in DP12/1. We said we would, where appropriate, distribute Directive requirements<br />
between <strong>the</strong> most suitable parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Handbook; for example, rules for systems and<br />
controls in SYSC and rules for conduct <strong>of</strong> business in COBS. At <strong>the</strong> same time, we<br />
proposed a new sourcebook to replace COLL, to accommodate both AIFMD and expected<br />
future changes to <strong>the</strong> UCITS Directive.<br />
2.<strong>32</strong> Some respondents to DP12/1 did not agree with this suggested approach and asked instead for<br />
COLL to be retained and a new, separate sourcebook to be created for o<strong>the</strong>r funds and fund<br />
managers subject to AIFMD. The reasons <strong>the</strong>y gave were convenience and ease <strong>of</strong> reference for<br />
firms managing only authorised funds; it would be less disruptive to <strong>the</strong>m than introducing a<br />
single comprehensive funds sourcebook under <strong>the</strong> banner <strong>of</strong> AIFMD implementation.<br />
Financial Services Authority 19