CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
CP12/32: Implementation of the Alternative ... - BVCA admin
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CP12</strong>/<strong>32</strong><br />
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Alternative</strong> Investment Fund Managers Directive<br />
Annex X<br />
has been disclosed in <strong>the</strong> relevant AIF’s constitutional documentation. 59 This covers similar<br />
ground to Principle 6 and is an example <strong>of</strong> an AIFMD-specific rule addressing an area<br />
where <strong>the</strong> Handbook Principles and rules currently apply more generically to authorised<br />
firms. However, it provides more detail on <strong>the</strong> circumstances in which an AIFM can give<br />
preferential treatment to an AIF investor.<br />
7.13 Examples <strong>of</strong> preferential treatment include reduced fees, better access to portfolio data or<br />
preferential terms in relation to side pockets. Such preferential treatment might, for<br />
example, be granted to ‘seed’ investors to compensate <strong>the</strong>m for <strong>the</strong> risks <strong>the</strong>y have taken.<br />
Respondents to DP12/1 also suggested that fair treatment <strong>of</strong> investors might include<br />
disclosing side letters to all AIF investors and ensuring that <strong>the</strong> preferential terms given to<br />
one investor are available to o<strong>the</strong>r investors in a similar position. 60 We expect <strong>the</strong> Level 2<br />
Regulation when adopted to contain more detailed requirements on fair treatment.<br />
7.14 Most respondents to DP12/1 agreed that <strong>the</strong> broad principle <strong>of</strong> fair treatment should apply<br />
to pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors in <strong>the</strong> same way as to retail investors. 61 However, respondents<br />
noted that pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors may be more inclined to negotiate <strong>the</strong>ir own terms <strong>of</strong><br />
investment ra<strong>the</strong>r than buying standardised units or shares in a scheme. It would <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
be more common to see pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors treated differently from each o<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
would be <strong>the</strong> case with retail investors. This is not inconsistent with <strong>the</strong> requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Directive, as long as <strong>the</strong> terms agreed with investors are adequately disclosed and do not<br />
result in overall material disadvantage to o<strong>the</strong>r investors.<br />
7.15 The recently published Journey to <strong>the</strong> FCA 62 envisages a more interventionist approach to<br />
supervising conduct in <strong>the</strong> wholesale markets, noting that wholesale misconduct can<br />
undermine market integrity and indirectly affect retail consumers. Our approach to<br />
supervising <strong>the</strong> fair treatment <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional AIF investors will reflect this. While we<br />
recognise that pr<strong>of</strong>essional investors have a greater understanding <strong>of</strong> sophisticated financial<br />
products than retail investors, firms will need to ensure that <strong>the</strong>y have high standards <strong>of</strong><br />
conduct in <strong>the</strong>ir dealings with all investors.<br />
Conflicts <strong>of</strong> interests<br />
7.16 The Directive requires firms to put in place organisational and <strong>admin</strong>istrative<br />
arrangements to identify, prevent, manage and monitor conflicts <strong>of</strong> interest. The rules<br />
transposing <strong>the</strong>se governance requirements 63 appear in SYSC 10.1 along with <strong>the</strong> conflicts<br />
<strong>of</strong> interest requirements for o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> authorised firm. It is intended that SYSC 10.1<br />
will refer to <strong>the</strong> relevant articles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Level 2 Regulation, which we expect to contain<br />
59 Article 12(1) AIFMD.<br />
60 Question 5 in DP12/1.<br />
61 Question 6 in DP12/1.<br />
62 p31, Journey to <strong>the</strong> FCA, October 2012.<br />
63 Set out in Articles 14 and 12(1)(d) AIFMD.<br />
50 Financial Services Authority November 2012