&1J4~ - City of Glendale

PART C
,_
-
STATEMENT OF .... .J.ROR:
. '.
. 13. , D? )'o.u cC?~ I,epd thaI there was 3 "iolalion of a specific provision of law which fonns the basis for lhis appeal?
, c ''. . y" 1i1I. No.' tJ
b. If you answer (a:' ,a" is "Ye~ ,. s ~ t e each specir~] rqvision of law you conlend was violaled.
~:to.t:..,,~ JU. ... ~ (
2a. Do you contend that the board, commission or officer exce.erlerl its authority by virtue of any of the provisions
of law given in answer "lb"1 Yes ~ No 0
b, If your answer to "2a" is "Yes", · icate which prov·sions and slate speclficallY 'each act which was in excess of
authority: ~~
3a, Do you contend !hal the board, commission or officer (ailed to fulfill a mandatory duty by any provision of law
given in answer to "l b"? Yes~ No D . . . ,. ,
b. If you answer to" " is "Ye " tale ,hlch pravi ion nd the specific du ty which It (ailed [0 cxercisc.
43. Do you contend that the board, commission or officer refused [0 hear or consider certain facts before rendering its
decision? Yes !Xl No 0 .
b. If your answer to "4a" is "Yes", stale each such (act and for each fact, slate how it should havc changed the act,
detennination or ruJing: . "1
,)""" 4;Hadit .",,-~d- (
Sa. Do you contend that the evidence before lhe b03J"d, c~mmission or orrK:er was insufficient 0c.l9adequale to
support its action, delennination or ruling or any specific finding in SupP0rlthereof'? Yes ~ No 0
b. lfyour answer 10 ·'Sb" is "Yes", state wh e~i:~+ was necessary but lacking:
. - , (
6a. Do ·you contend Ihat you have new evidence of malenal facts no! previously presented, which if considered
should change the act, dClcnninalion, or ruling? Ycs D No ~ .
b. If your answer 10 "6a" is "Yes", Slale each new material ract not previously presented to [he board, comrllission
or officer, (and for each racl Slate why it was not avai lablc or with the exercisc or reasonable diligence could nOl
have been discovered and presenled previously by appellant).
The foregoing slatements contained in PART B and PART C, above, are true lind correct to the best of my
koowlodg' ",d boli,r.·
..---.-c- , , '-{- l( I ;c
.~'i. 1 ,L.- ~ )oJ ~
'1-/0
Filed:
Appeal received by 5jIY ClerklZoning Administrator
BY:P;)h~
Appeal Fee $/tJO ,,(J
R" dp' No . I J ? $1(
(if applicable)
(
,