EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven
EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven
EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104 Equality Guide<br />
3.5. Conclusions and recommendations<br />
3.5.1. General conclusions<br />
On the whole, the vacancies are drawn up in a gender-neutral way, both with regard to<br />
the job titles and the vacancy texts. Nevertheless, the inconsistent use of job titles may<br />
result in a feeling of gender inequality. For example, the position of academic assistant<br />
is used in the following ways: wetenschappelijk medewerker, wetenschappelijk<br />
medewerker (m/v), wetenschappelijk mederwerk(st)er and the English term. Because of<br />
gender-specific additions to an originally gender-neutral term, female applicants may<br />
give this term a male connotation when used normally, thus unwillingly creating a<br />
gender bias in the recruitment system. Within the scope of this research, a checklist was<br />
developed that may serve as a guideline for the authors of vacancies (see Tool Annex).<br />
Moreover, the use of an unequivocal recruitment policy should be encouraged by reducing<br />
the inconsistent use of style, lay-out, phrasing and structure. When gender discrimination<br />
occurs, it is often done unconsciously. Therefore, general guidelines and<br />
training are of paramount importance for the authors of the vacancies. Since these<br />
corrective measures are time-consuming, the vacancies should at the very least be<br />
monitored by people with an eye for implicit and explicit gender inequalities.<br />
3.5.2. Prospects for further research<br />
The decision whether or not to use neutralization or differentiation in the vacancy policy<br />
of a university has to be made in collaboration with the personnel administration<br />
and in close connection with an extensive screening of the selection and recruitment<br />
policy. Therefore, the checklist must be seen temporarily as a permissive measure.<br />
Besides examining the global selection procedure, research has to be done into the<br />
establishment of an image of male and female staff at universities. Currently, the website<br />
with vacancies contains only one picture of a man in a pharmaceutical lab (white<br />
coat, glasses, tie, holding a test tube). Apart from the low level of relevancy for the<br />
content of the academic profession in general, this picture hardly breaks any social<br />
conventions. However, the GECO-project has proven that the correct use of visual<br />
material can nuance an otherwise stereotypical text. By presenting men as well as<br />
women in various professions, all applicants are addressed directly. The manner in<br />
which men and women are presented in the publications and on the website of a university<br />
may be important for the global interpretation of a gender-neutral personnel<br />
and student policy.<br />
Consequently, this module should be seen as the first impetus to further qualitative and<br />
quantitative research. Potential fields of study concerning the selection and recruitment<br />
of staff are:<br />
! Preparation: through which channels are the vacancies distributed, are potential<br />
applicants informed about vacant positions?