24.04.2014 Views

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 ! Career paths: recruitment ! promotion ! dismissal 81<br />

2.3.3. Timing<br />

Because the research group consisted exclusively of students, the academic calendar<br />

had to be taken into account when determining the start and end date of the survey. It<br />

was decided to make the survey available from 14 November 2006 till 18 December<br />

2006. This period was chosen because:<br />

1. The academic year has progressed sufficiently to acquaint the students with Minerva.<br />

2. It precedes the Christmas holiday. Hence, the students can still use the university’s<br />

IT facilities.<br />

3. It precedes the first study and examination period. During this period, Minerva is<br />

extensively used by students to catch up with the lectures or to improve their notes.<br />

The expected end date was 18 December 2006, but a large-scale survey from the Central<br />

Administration on the students’ restaurants ended all small-scale surveys early.<br />

The surveys had their highest response rate in the initial period. In the beginning of<br />

December, we still received about thirty new completed surveys a day. Nonetheless,<br />

the survey was definitively closed on 4 December. The results were gathered in an<br />

Excel table by the IT experts and sent to the project researcher by e-mail.<br />

2.3.4. Analysis<br />

Knowledge about the real number of students was needed to calculate the respondents’<br />

representativeness. The Department of Educational Affairs of UGent was asked<br />

to provide the student statistics of the academic year 2006-2007, sex-segregated and<br />

divided into study levels (i.e. bachelors and masters) and into the various faculties.<br />

2.4. Instrument and case study results<br />

2.4.1. Instrument: Survey of final-year students<br />

For the instrument: see Tool Annex.<br />

The development and division of the questions was preceded by a thorough reading of<br />

the aforementioned studies (see 2.2. Literature Study). To limit the time needed to fill<br />

in the survey, it was decided to use mainly closed questions. The survey was subdivided<br />

into a number of themes, including the choice of a certain discipline and the<br />

choice to study at Ghent University, as well as the students’ perceptions and expectations<br />

about an academic career. These themes were preceded by a number of general<br />

questions concerning the respondents’ sex, nationality, age, year of study and field of<br />

study. Because the new BaMa-reform creates a whole range of possible subject combi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!