24.04.2014 Views

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 ! Career paths: recruitment ! promotion ! dismissal 83<br />

to explore whether the choices of the male and female students are in fact determined<br />

by different motives and factors.<br />

2.4.1.2. Career expectations<br />

The various theories on personal and social motives could also be applied to the survey’s<br />

second section ‘career expectations’. To develop the second theme, the results<br />

from the research on PhD-students 93 and the study ‘Wetenschap tussen roeping en<br />

beroep’ 94 were taken into account. That way, the students’ general expectations concerning<br />

job opportunities could be compared to their perception of a career at Ghent<br />

University. The study ‘Wetenschap tussen roeping en beroep’ noted that young researchers,<br />

though very motivated at the beginning of their career, often feel disappointed<br />

with the daily routine. The discouragement is not so much the result of the<br />

nature or content of the job, but rather of the disappointing terms of employment, the<br />

working conditions and the competitive atmosphere 95 .<br />

Both studies discuss the advantages and disadvantages of an academic career in great<br />

detail. To summarize, it may be stated that scientists choose an academic career for<br />

various reasons:<br />

! fascination for a specific research subject;<br />

! the freedom to develop an idea;<br />

! the freedom to plan one’s day (e.g. flexibility, gliding office hours, teleworking)<br />

enables a satisfying work-family combination;<br />

! the social recognition of scientific research.<br />

Potential bottlenecks, on the other hand, are:<br />

! the ambiguous interpretation of the working conditions (in contrast to other sectors);<br />

! the uncertain career perspective;<br />

! the poor coaching of PhD students;<br />

! the fierce competition between colleagues;<br />

! the monotony of the work;<br />

! the unexpected lack of freedom with respect to the research content;<br />

! the lack of sufficient office space and solid office supplies;<br />

! the publish-or-perish attitude.<br />

Both studies also examined the best way to obtain an academic career. They unanimously<br />

list the following ways: applying for a vacant position, contacting lecturers or<br />

other staff members, excelling during lectures and thus being asked to write a PhD. In<br />

the following part, it will be examined whether the conceptualization of the students of<br />

Ghent University conforms to the findings of the aforementioned studies.<br />

93<br />

94<br />

95<br />

Verlinden et al. (2005), op. cit.<br />

De Gier et al. (2001), op. cit.<br />

De Gier et al. (2001), op. cit., p. 9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!