24.04.2014 Views

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 Equality Guide<br />

I’m asked by fellow students to join social activities outside the classroom. 0.531<br />

I have the feeling that I have to minimize particular aspects of my background to &0.355<br />

be part of the group.<br />

Factor 2: " =0.855<br />

Insulting remarks or jokes about women. 0.748<br />

Insulting remarks or jokes about LGBT persons. 0.797<br />

Insulting remarks or jokes about ethnic minorities. 0.776<br />

Insulting remarks or jokes about people with disabilities. 0.788<br />

Insulting remarks or jokes about other things. 0.565<br />

Factor 3: Contacts with other students " = 0.650<br />

How often contact with LGB students. 0.534<br />

How often contact with students from another ethnic background. 0.715<br />

How often contact with students with disabilities. 0.391<br />

How often contact with students from another social background. 0.666<br />

Extraction Method: Principal Axis Factoring. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.<br />

3.7.7. Calculating scores<br />

Scores had to be calculated for parts one, two and three. For part one, dealing with<br />

organizational climate, scores were calculated on the six different scales for each respondent,<br />

along with the total score of all scales. This total score was reduced to 10<br />

points, with 10 being the maximum score. This is easier to compare with since not<br />

every scale has the same number of items and maximum scores would be different.<br />

This resulted in seven new variables (six scales plus total score). The higher the score,<br />

the more positive the organizational climate is perceived. So a score of 10 means that a<br />

respondent perceives her/his climate as very positive. For part two, dealing with wellbeing,<br />

a new variable was created that includes the total score (out of 10) of each respondent<br />

on the different items. For part three, which is about attitudes, another step<br />

had to be taken first before calculating the scores. It is important to take into account<br />

the ‘no opinion’ answers. First the frequencies for those answers are calculated and<br />

then the ‘no opinion’ answer is left out to calculate the score on this scale. In this case,<br />

the score was not reduced to 10 but those on the attitude questions were just added<br />

up. The lower the score, the more positive the attitude (e.g. if you have 13 attitude<br />

questions, then 13 is the lowest score and 52 is the maximum score).<br />

When calculating the score for the ‘Superior’s openness to equal opportunities’ scale<br />

for administrative and technical personnel, the items about flexible working hours and<br />

working at home were omitted because staff from these categories often have to be<br />

present at certain hours (e.g. kitchen personnel, secretary staff).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!