24.04.2014 Views

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 2 ! Career paths: recruitment ! promotion ! dismissal 91<br />

women (41%) than men (18%), the previous part of the survey showed that students<br />

label the atmosphere at Ghent University as friendly rather than competitive. The study<br />

‘Wetenschap tussen roeping en beroep’ 96 also postulates that the competition between<br />

colleagues is one of the main causes of the early outflow at universities. The low percentage<br />

of students who regard the competitive aspect of an academic career as a<br />

disadvantage can be explained by the assumption that most students underestimate<br />

the rivalry between scientists. Consequently, it only becomes a negative factor as one<br />

climbs the academic ladder. Finally, the respondents consider neither the income nor<br />

the lack of recognition as major obstacles.<br />

The last part of the survey focuses on the representation of scientists. The respondents<br />

had to indicate to what extent they agree with a list of (positive and negative)<br />

characteristics. More than 90% of the respondents label scientists as passionate, enthusiastic,<br />

intelligent, ambitious, immune to stress and efficient. As became apparent from<br />

previous data, most students seem to believe that scientists earn high wages. The<br />

image of the male scientist in an ivory tower no longer applies. Only 11% of the male<br />

and 17% of the female students consider the practice of science as a purely male activity.<br />

Furthermore, according to the respondents, scientists are anything but unworldly<br />

since they keep abreast of topical matters. Scientists are also seen as leaders rather<br />

than team-players. Notwithstanding the apparent unanimity about a scientist’s characteristics,<br />

the male respondents prove to have a somewhat more positive image. Thus,<br />

more male than female students assign characteristics such as flexibility and creativity<br />

to scientists. Although female respondents have a positive image of scientists in general,<br />

they describe scientists more often as boring, grave people with a high ‘nerd’<br />

level. The most striking and significant gender difference is that 31% of female and<br />

only 18% of male respondents believe that scientists have to sacrifice a lot of their<br />

social life in general and family life in particular to succeed in their job. Quite contradictorily,<br />

at least 95% of the respondents picture a scientist as a man or a woman with<br />

children.<br />

2.5. Conclusions and recommendations<br />

2.5.1. General conclusions<br />

The results of the survey largely correspond to the findings of the research on PhDstudents<br />

97 and the study ‘Wetenschap tussen roeping en beroep’ 98 . In contrast to the<br />

students questioned in the study ‘Wetenschap tussen roeping en beroep’, the students<br />

at Ghent University believe that scientists earn high wages. Consequently, this is expe-<br />

96<br />

97<br />

98<br />

De Gier et al. (2001), op. cit.<br />

Verlinden et al. (2005), op. cit.<br />

De Gier et al. (2001), op. cit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!