24.04.2014 Views

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126 Equality Guide<br />

confronted with the reluctance of the older staff and the shortage of funds. The productivity<br />

was hampered by feuds between departments and professors and nothing was<br />

done to mend matters. They did not have a say in certain matters and felt they needed<br />

new challenges.<br />

Three men were also disappointed with the atmosphere at work, although it was not<br />

their main motive to leave. They complained about the absence of intellectual debate,<br />

their uninterested colleagues, the absence of an international network, the time-consuming<br />

meetings etc. Five men said the relationships with their superiors were very<br />

hierarchical and even dictatorial. Co-operation was not always appreciated.<br />

5.4.2.2. Views on gender in academic circles 138<br />

Most of the interviewed women (11) and men (10) think gender plays an important<br />

role in the advancement of an academic career, as they can derive from the low number<br />

of women at the academic top. However, very few people gave a circumstantial<br />

explanation. Most researchers think it is not due to overt discrimination, but point to<br />

individual choices, social and cultural factors and organizational aspects. Besides the<br />

explanations below, two men blame the patriarchal atmosphere between supervisors<br />

and PhD-students, others think women are less self-confident in a male-dominated<br />

world or have to fight more to advance to a higher position. Some women said that the<br />

prototype of a scientist is still male and strongly believe that female researchers have to<br />

be better than their male competitors.<br />

5.4.2.2.1. Competitiveness and ambition<br />

Three men and three women think women’s restraints with regard to heavy competition<br />

are crucial for the under-representation of women. They think women are less<br />

competitive and withdraw more often from the race. However, as became clear above,<br />

as many men as women considered the fierce competition a motive to leave the university<br />

and seven male researchers equally regretted this aspect. Moreover, although<br />

eight men clearly chose to do a PhD, seven of the interviewed men did not aspire a<br />

professorship and six of them did not start their research with a clear goal of what they<br />

wanted to achieve. Three men were still in doubt whether to go on or not. What is<br />

striking, is a general absence of career planning and a dim view on the future.<br />

This is different for the female researchers. Although slightly more women (8) than men<br />

said they did not aspire a professorship, only three women did not have a career planning<br />

in mind, and three would have liked to become a professor. As many women as<br />

men made a well-considered choice to do a PhD. Many more women (10) than men<br />

(4) emphasized the necessity of support in the advancement of a career, rather than<br />

ambition or merit. Comparably, eight women sometimes asked themselves whether<br />

they would be able to make it, whereas only three men doubted their capacities.<br />

138 See table 2.8 in the Appendices.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!