24.04.2014 Views

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

EQUALITY GUIdE - KU Leuven

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3 ! Career management 159<br />

Good Practice Mainstreaming Promoters: participation<br />

In the ‘Tweede Gelijke Kansenrapport’ 187 scissor diagrams were generated for all faculties. For the<br />

Faculty of Science the scissor diagram showed that the largest drop-out of female academics was<br />

to be found in the promotion from post-doctoral researcher to Assistant Professor. More detailed<br />

information was asked by the Mainstreaming Promoters from the Diversity Policy Office. Analyses<br />

of the appointment figures showed that there was a lack of female candidates. The Mainstreaming<br />

Promoters of the Faculty of Science decided to make it a point of action for the next academic<br />

year to create some portraits of female scientists on their website as role-models for their female<br />

post-doctoral researchers.<br />

4. Instrument and case study<br />

The ‘Career management’ module of the K.U.<strong>Leuven</strong> aimed at developing new tools<br />

and/or optimize existing tools concerning equal opportunities and career management. As<br />

described in the Process report, the K.U.<strong>Leuven</strong> was used as a case study to develop and<br />

optimize such tools.<br />

This part will describe the tools and the correct way of using them.<br />

4.1. Tool: mapping career and promotion opportunities<br />

For this tool: see Tool Annex.<br />

In the Process report we started out from the Instrumental model to integrate the Gender<br />

Mainstreaming concept in career management. A new simple model was drawn up (see<br />

tool: Mapping career and promotion opportunities) to show how the module was developed<br />

along the way and what methods can be used to map the career opportunities of<br />

the personnel.<br />

4.1.1. Identify possible gender issues<br />

First, we needed to show if a gender problem existed for the different statutes (ZAP,<br />

ABAP, ATP): quantitative analyses were performed on the data of the official annual<br />

reports of the university. Scissor diagrams clearly showed whether or not there was a<br />

gender problem. If not, no further research would be needed.<br />

187 K.U.<strong>Leuven</strong>, Centrum voor Gelijke Kansenbeleid (2004), op. cit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!