15.05.2014 Views

downloads/Killip 2.pdf - Passion Flowers

downloads/Killip 2.pdf - Passion Flowers

downloads/Killip 2.pdf - Passion Flowers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

392 FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY BOTANY, VOL. XIX<br />

treatment in the Amoenitates, which cites a large number of "pre-<br />

Linnaean" references, some of which, including the figure (pi. 10,<br />

/. 19}, certainly apply to P. edulis. The only specimen in the<br />

Linnean Herbarium which is labeled P. incarnata and was in Linnaeus'<br />

possession in 1753 is true P. incarnata, and there can be no<br />

doubt that this name should be applied to the plant native in the<br />

United States.<br />

Plate 152 of the Botanical Register is headed Passiflora incarnata<br />

/3.<br />

After citing several references which are applicable<br />

to both P. incarnata and P. edulis Ker distinguishes between the<br />

two "varieties" thus:<br />

(a) foliis vage et ad nervos subvillosis; germine villoso; bacca<br />

viridi-lutea.<br />

(j8)<br />

folis nudiusculis; germine glabro; bacco livido-purpurascente.<br />

Regarding the distribution of the plant there figured Ker says,<br />

"A native of Carolina and Virginia, most probably also of some<br />

parts of South America." In a note at the end of the volume Ker<br />

states that he later learned that the plant came from Brazil. There<br />

can be no doubt that this illustration of P. incarnata /3 represents<br />

the plant later described as P. edulis. Plate 332 of the Botanical<br />

headed Passiflora incarnata, and Ker evidently intended<br />

Register is<br />

it to be a representation of his variety a mentioned under Plate 152,<br />

the North American plant. The picture is a fairly accurate illustration<br />

of P. incarnata except for the fact that the margin of<br />

leaves is shown as entire.<br />

the<br />

I consider this an error on the part of the<br />

artist, for Ker surely would have noted such an important point<br />

had the leaves really been entire. This inaccurate drawing led to<br />

the proposal of Passiflora Kerii Spreng. and Passiflora incarnata<br />

var. Kerii DC. (Passiflora edulis var.<br />

Kerii Mast.).<br />

I am following Britton in the selection of P. incarnata as the type<br />

species of Passiflora, and I believe the choice of P. rubra (Int. Bot.<br />

Congr. 1930, p. 186) an unfortunate one. The latter was chosen<br />

because it is "a well-known and widely distributed species, belonging<br />

to the largest section, Decaloba." Should Passiflora be divided into<br />

smaller genera, it is highly desirable that the historic name be<br />

retained for the showy flowered granadillas, among which are the<br />

familiar cultivated species P. caerulea, P. edulis, P. quadrangularis,<br />

P. laurifolia, and P. maliformis. The number of species in Decaloba<br />

(in the sense of Plectostemma of the present treatment) is 115, only<br />

slightly greater than inGranadilla (96). Moreover, P. rubra belongs<br />

to a very small group ( Xerogona) within Plectostemma, which might,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!