downloads/Killip 2.pdf - Passion Flowers
downloads/Killip 2.pdf - Passion Flowers
downloads/Killip 2.pdf - Passion Flowers
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
392 FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY BOTANY, VOL. XIX<br />
treatment in the Amoenitates, which cites a large number of "pre-<br />
Linnaean" references, some of which, including the figure (pi. 10,<br />
/. 19}, certainly apply to P. edulis. The only specimen in the<br />
Linnean Herbarium which is labeled P. incarnata and was in Linnaeus'<br />
possession in 1753 is true P. incarnata, and there can be no<br />
doubt that this name should be applied to the plant native in the<br />
United States.<br />
Plate 152 of the Botanical Register is headed Passiflora incarnata<br />
/3.<br />
After citing several references which are applicable<br />
to both P. incarnata and P. edulis Ker distinguishes between the<br />
two "varieties" thus:<br />
(a) foliis vage et ad nervos subvillosis; germine villoso; bacca<br />
viridi-lutea.<br />
(j8)<br />
folis nudiusculis; germine glabro; bacco livido-purpurascente.<br />
Regarding the distribution of the plant there figured Ker says,<br />
"A native of Carolina and Virginia, most probably also of some<br />
parts of South America." In a note at the end of the volume Ker<br />
states that he later learned that the plant came from Brazil. There<br />
can be no doubt that this illustration of P. incarnata /3 represents<br />
the plant later described as P. edulis. Plate 332 of the Botanical<br />
headed Passiflora incarnata, and Ker evidently intended<br />
Register is<br />
it to be a representation of his variety a mentioned under Plate 152,<br />
the North American plant. The picture is a fairly accurate illustration<br />
of P. incarnata except for the fact that the margin of<br />
leaves is shown as entire.<br />
the<br />
I consider this an error on the part of the<br />
artist, for Ker surely would have noted such an important point<br />
had the leaves really been entire. This inaccurate drawing led to<br />
the proposal of Passiflora Kerii Spreng. and Passiflora incarnata<br />
var. Kerii DC. (Passiflora edulis var.<br />
Kerii Mast.).<br />
I am following Britton in the selection of P. incarnata as the type<br />
species of Passiflora, and I believe the choice of P. rubra (Int. Bot.<br />
Congr. 1930, p. 186) an unfortunate one. The latter was chosen<br />
because it is "a well-known and widely distributed species, belonging<br />
to the largest section, Decaloba." Should Passiflora be divided into<br />
smaller genera, it is highly desirable that the historic name be<br />
retained for the showy flowered granadillas, among which are the<br />
familiar cultivated species P. caerulea, P. edulis, P. quadrangularis,<br />
P. laurifolia, and P. maliformis. The number of species in Decaloba<br />
(in the sense of Plectostemma of the present treatment) is 115, only<br />
slightly greater than inGranadilla (96). Moreover, P. rubra belongs<br />
to a very small group ( Xerogona) within Plectostemma, which might,