16.05.2014 Views

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82 | <strong>Patent</strong> it YOURSELF<br />

1. The Positive and Negative Factors Test<br />

Every invention, no matter how many positive factors it<br />

seems to have at first glance, inevitably has one or more<br />

significant negative ones. To evaluate the positive and<br />

negative factors objectively, carefully consider each on<br />

the list below. Using Form 4-1, Positive and Negative<br />

Factors Evaluation Sheet (a copy is in Appendix 7), assign<br />

a commercial value or disadvantage weight to each factor<br />

on a scale of –100 to +100, according to your best, carefully<br />

considered estimate. If the factor is irrelevant to your<br />

invention, assign a weight of 0.<br />

For example, if an invention provides overwhelming cost<br />

savings in relation to its existing counterparts, assign a +80<br />

or higher to the “Cost” factor (#1) in the positive column.<br />

But if it requires a high capital expenditure (tooling) to<br />

build, a –50 would be appropriate for this factor (#45), and<br />

so on.<br />

The following balance scale analogy will help you to<br />

understand the positive and negative factors evaluation:<br />

Pretend the positive factors are stacked on one side of a<br />

balance scale and the negative factors are stacked on the<br />

other side, as indicated in Fig. 4A.<br />

Positive Factors Negative Factors<br />

Fig. 4A—Conceptual Weighing of Positive v. Negative Factors<br />

If the positive factors (those given a weight from +1 to<br />

+100) strongly outweigh the negative (those from –1 to<br />

–100), the arrow would swing to the right and you can<br />

regard this as a “go” indication, that is, the invention is<br />

commercially viable. Obviously this balance scale is just an<br />

analogy. <strong>It</strong> can’t be used with any true quantitative accuracy<br />

because no one has yet come up with a way to assign<br />

accurate and valid weights to the factors. Nevertheless,<br />

you’ll find it of great help in evaluating the commercial<br />

prospects of your invention.<br />

Before you actually take pen (or word processor) in hand<br />

and begin your evaluation, read through the following<br />

summary of positive and negative factors.<br />

You should consider each factor carefully, especially if<br />

you assign a negative value, even if the negative value is<br />

merely due to the need to change or design and produce<br />

new production equipment. I’ve seen inventions and<br />

developments that were better in every way than what<br />

already existed, but which weren’t used solely because<br />

the improvement didn’t justify the cost of replacing<br />

existing production equipment, or the cost associated with<br />

manufacturing and promoting the device.<br />

The factors of your invention with negative values are<br />

generally more important and require more consideration<br />

than do those with positive values, since if your invention<br />

fails, it will obviously be one or more of the negatives that<br />

causes it. On the other hand, the positive factors will be of<br />

great value to you when convincing a patent examiner as to<br />

your invention’s patentability, or when selling the invention<br />

to a potential licensee.<br />

2. Factors Affecting the Marketability<br />

of Your Invention<br />

1. Cost. Is your invention cheaper or more expensive to<br />

build or use than current counterparts? An example<br />

where making something more expensive to build<br />

would be an advantage is a credit or eligibility card;<br />

a more expensive card would be more difficult to<br />

counterfeit.<br />

2. Weight. Is your invention lighter (or heavier) in weight<br />

than what is already known, and is such change in<br />

weight a benefit? For example, if you’ve invented a new<br />

automobile or airplane engine, a reduction in weight<br />

is a great benefit. But if you’ve invented a new ballast<br />

material, obviously an increase in weight (provided it<br />

doesn’t come at too great a cost in money or bulk) is a<br />

benefit.<br />

3. Size. Is your invention smaller or larger in size or<br />

capacity than what is already known, and is such<br />

change in size a benefit?<br />

4. Safety/Health Factors. Is your invention safer or<br />

healthier to use than what is already known? Clearly<br />

there’s a strong trend in government and industry to<br />

improve the safety and reduce the possible chances<br />

for injury, harm, and product liability suits in most<br />

products and processes, and this trend has given birth<br />

to many new inventions. Often a greater increase in cost<br />

and weight will be tolerated if certain safety and health<br />

benefits accrue. But beware, some safety devices cause<br />

more harm than they prevent: For example, antilock<br />

brakes have caused more skids and accidents than<br />

conventional brakes, because users tend to pump them,<br />

although they are supposed to be pressed continuously.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!