16.05.2014 Views

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ChaPter 8 | How to DRAFT the SPECIFICATION and INITIAL DRAWINGS | 191<br />

application. In other words, you’ll build from these as you<br />

write your specification and claims.<br />

The main reason I discuss sketches at this point is<br />

that you have to do your sketches prior to drafting the<br />

specification, as well as the other parts of the application.<br />

You don’t have to worry about planning any layout of your<br />

figures on the drawing sheets, or the size of the figures—yet.<br />

This will be covered in detail in Chapter 10. For now, merely<br />

complete a set of sketches showing all of the aspects of your<br />

invention without worrying about size or arrangement;<br />

these sketch-figures can even be done very large and on<br />

separate sheets. Later on they can be reduced and compiled<br />

onto the drawing sheets as part of the “finaling” process<br />

(Chapter 10).<br />

After you’ve completed your sketches, write down a<br />

name for each part adjacent to such part in each sketch,<br />

such as “handlebar,” “handgrip,” “clamp,” “bolt,” etc.<br />

Write the names of the parts lightly in pencil so that you<br />

can change them readily if you think of a better term.<br />

Use lead lines to connect each name to its part if the parts<br />

are crowded enough to cause confusion. If you have any<br />

difficulty naming any part, refer to the Glossary of Useful<br />

Terms (Appendix 3), your prior-art patents, or a visual<br />

dictionary such as The Firefly Visual Dictionary by Corbeil<br />

and Archambault (Firefly Books, 2002) or the Visual<br />

Dictionary of Science (DK Publishing, 1998).<br />

Your drawing should be done in separate, unconnected<br />

figures, each one labeled (“Fig. 1,” “Fig. 2,” etc.) so that all<br />

possible different views and embodiments of your invention<br />

are shown. If two figures are related, you can refer to them<br />

with the same number but with different suffixes or primes,<br />

for example, “Fig. 1A,” “Fig. 1B,” etc., or “Fig. 1,” “Fig. 1´,”<br />

etc. Use as many views as necessary. Look at a relevant<br />

prior-art patent to get an idea as to how it’s done. The<br />

views should generally be perspective or isometric views,<br />

rather than front, side, and top, engineering-type views.<br />

If you have trouble illustrating a perspective view, take a<br />

photo of a model of your invention from the desired angle<br />

and draw the photo—perhaps by enlarging and tracing it.<br />

Alternatively you can use a “see and draw” copying device<br />

of the type employing a half-silvered mirror in a viewing<br />

head on a pedestal; these are available in art supply stores<br />

and through gadget mail-order houses. Hidden lines<br />

should be shown in broken lines, as shown in Fig. 8C. For<br />

complicated machines, exploded views are desirable as<br />

shown in Fig. 8D. The drawings must be filed as a separate<br />

document from your patent application (whether filing<br />

in paper or via the Internet). Never include your drawing<br />

sheets as part or pages of the written description.<br />

Fig. 8C—Isometric View With Hidden Lines<br />

You can use any reasonable symbols for mechanical,<br />

electronic/electrical, and chemical parts; the PTO has no<br />

requirements in this area, except that the symbols not be<br />

outrageous. I suggest you use conventional symbols, such as<br />

those approved by the ANSI (American National Standards<br />

Institute), those used in conventional texts, or those used in<br />

your prior-art patents. In lieu of graphical symbols, labeled<br />

boxes are also acceptable, so long as the part represented by<br />

the box is standard or conventional.<br />

If you have an electronic system, a block diagram with<br />

each block labeled (for example, “Schmitt Trigger,” “flipflop,”<br />

“inverter”) is fine. If any block represents a nonconventional<br />

circuit, however, be sure that you explain<br />

clearly what’s in the block or provide a reference to a<br />

suitable publication. If any block represents a programmed<br />

microprocessor or computer, remember that you must<br />

provide a listing of the program or a software flowchart to<br />

provide a complete disclosure. (See Section F, above.)<br />

If possible, one figure of your drawing should be<br />

comprehensive enough to show the basic idea of the<br />

invention and to be suitable for inclusion in the Official<br />

Gazette (OG). If the PTO grants your patent, they will<br />

publish one figure, the main claim, and the bibliographic<br />

details of your patent in the OG. See Chapter 6, Section K,<br />

for more on the OG. The other figures can be fragmentary<br />

or partial views; you don’t have to show the same details<br />

more than once.<br />

Different colors and different shades of gray can be<br />

shown with different types of shading lines, but provide<br />

a suitable decoding legend in a separate figure. For more<br />

information, see Nolo’s How to Make <strong>Patent</strong> Drawings, by<br />

Jack Lo and David Pressman.<br />

If your invention is related to a prior-art device, you may<br />

want to illustrate the prior-art device in the first figure of<br />

drawings so that you can explain it and its drawbacks. This<br />

Fig. must be labeled “Prior Art.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!