16.05.2014 Views

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54 | <strong>Patent</strong> it YOURSELF<br />

be as impartial and competent as possible, which means<br />

they shouldn’t be close relatives or people who have been<br />

working so closely with you as to be possible coinventors.<br />

A knowledgeable friend, business associate, or professional<br />

will make an excellent witness, provided he or she has the<br />

necessary technical ability or background to understand<br />

the invention. Generally, a witness who understands<br />

what the invention does and how it’s made and used will<br />

be adequate. But if the invention is technically complex,<br />

it’s best to get a witness who understands the invention’s<br />

underlying theory. The witness should also be someone<br />

who’s likely to be avail able later. Obviously, a person who’s<br />

seriously ill, or of very advanced age, wouldn’t be a good<br />

choice. Don’t ask your patent attorney (if you are using one)<br />

to perform this function, since the courts and the PTO<br />

won’t allow an attorney to represent someone and also be<br />

that person’s witness.<br />

If the invention is a very simple mechanical device,<br />

practically anyone will have the technical qualifications to<br />

be a witness. But if it involves advanced chemical or electronic<br />

concepts, obviously a person with an adequate background<br />

in the field will have to be used. The witness need not<br />

understand the theory behind the invention, but should be<br />

knowledgeable enough to understand what it does and how<br />

it works. If called upon later, the witnesses should be able<br />

to testify to their own knowledge that the physical and/or<br />

chemical facts of the entry are correct. Thus they shouldn’t<br />

just be witnesses to your signature, so you should not use a<br />

notary or a lay person who just witnesses your signature, as<br />

do witnesses to a will. Rather the witnesses should actually<br />

read or view and understand the actual technical subject<br />

material in the notebook, including the actual tests if they<br />

are witnessing the building and testing (Fig. 3B). Obviously,<br />

then, you should call in your witnesses to observe your final<br />

tests and measurements so that they can later testify that<br />

they did witness them.<br />

Should You Have Your Notebook<br />

Entries or Disclosure Notarized?<br />

Many inventors ask if they should take their note book<br />

or disclosure to a notary and sign it before the notary<br />

and have the document notarized. While notarization<br />

is slightly better than no witnesses at all, notarization<br />

is far inferior to live witnesses. Why? In the U.S. system<br />

of jurisprudence, the triers of fact (judge or jury)<br />

base their decisions primarily on the testimony of live<br />

witnesses, who are subject to cross examination and who<br />

understand the document in question and are not merely<br />

a “signature witness.”<br />

While one witness may be sufficient, the law gives much<br />

greater credence to two. If both are available, your case will<br />

be very strong. Also having two witnesses will enhance the<br />

likelihood of at least one of them being available to testify at<br />

a later date. Also, if a dispute occurs between two inventors,<br />

the one with the greater number of witnesses will prevail,<br />

assuming all other considerations are substantially a wash.<br />

Some notebooks already contain, on each page, a line<br />

for the inventor’s signature and date, together with the<br />

words “Witnessed and Understood” with lines for two<br />

signatures and dates. If your notebook doesn’t already<br />

contain these words and signature lines, merely write them<br />

in as indicated in Figs. 3A to 3C. To really tie down the<br />

trade secret status of your invention, you should add the<br />

words “The above confidential information is” just before<br />

the words “Witnessed and Understood,” as has been done<br />

on Form 3-2 and on Figs. 3A, 3B, and 3C. You and the<br />

witnesses should sign and enter the date on the appropriate<br />

lines at the end of your description of the conception of<br />

your invention and at the end of your description of your<br />

building and testing.<br />

6. What to Do With the Notebook<br />

Now that you’ve made those nice notebook records of<br />

conception and hopefully building and testing, what should<br />

you do with the notebook? Basically nothing, except to keep<br />

it in a safe place in case it’s ever needed (hopefully not!) for<br />

one of the six “legal” reasons under Section C, above, and to<br />

use it liberally as needed for one of the “invention process”<br />

reasons under Section B, above.<br />

G. Another Way to Record Conception<br />

or Building and Testing—<br />

The Invention Disclosure<br />

Suppose you conclude that for some good reason it’s too<br />

difficult or inconvenient for you to keep a notebook or<br />

technical diary. There’s a second, albeit somewhat inferior,<br />

way for you to record the conception or building and testing<br />

of your invention. This is by using a document called an<br />

“Invention Disclosure.”<br />

Despite its formidable name, an Invention Disclosure<br />

is hardly different from a properly completed notebook<br />

entry of an invention. <strong>It</strong> should be a complete record of<br />

your invention, including a title, its purpose(s), advantages,<br />

a detailed description of it, in sufficient detail so that<br />

one having ordinary skill in the field of your invention<br />

will be able to make and use it, possible novel features,<br />

ramifications, details of its construction if you built it, and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!