16.05.2014 Views

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 | PATENT IT YOURSELF<br />

Inventor’s Commandment 10<br />

In recent years, the <strong>Patent</strong> Court began limiting the<br />

scope of some patents by relying upon “limiting statements”<br />

that the patentees made in their specifications<br />

and remarks to the PTO. For that reason, your patent<br />

application should not contain any statements that<br />

the courts could possibly use against you to limit the<br />

claims of your invention—that is, do not indicate any<br />

field of the invention, do not mention any problems<br />

with the prior art that are not already known, or that<br />

your invention doesn’t solve, do not indicate that any<br />

embodiment is preferred, do not include any specific<br />

advantage unless at least one embodiment has this<br />

advantage, indicate that “one or more aspects” have<br />

the advantages, do not include any objects, make the<br />

summary and abstract as broad and nonspecific as<br />

possible, do not refer to “the invention” but only to “this<br />

embodiment,” do not state that any part is essential,<br />

and include as many embodiments as possible.<br />

This and the next two chapters are the heart of this<br />

book: They cover the writing and transmittal of your<br />

patent application to the <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark Office<br />

(PTO). This chapter provides an overview of the patent<br />

application drafting process and contains specific<br />

instructions on drafting a specification and preliminary<br />

drawings. Chapter 9 explains how to draft patent claims<br />

(sentence fragments that delineate the precise scope of the<br />

patent being sought). Chapter 10 explains how to “final”<br />

the application as well as the precise steps involved in<br />

transmitting it to the PTO. In addition, Chapter 10 covers<br />

design patent applications.<br />

Because these subjects can be difficult to understand<br />

in the abstract, I use concrete examples throughout. And,<br />

at the end of this chapter, you’ll find the specification<br />

(including the abstract) and formal drawings of a sample<br />

patent application. Similarly, at the end of Chapter 9, you’ll<br />

find the patent claims of this same application. In Chapter<br />

10, I have provided a completed set of formal papers for a<br />

mailed application and full instructions for online filing.<br />

Inventor’s Commandment 11<br />

The specification and drawings of your patent<br />

application must contain a description of your<br />

invention in full, clear, concise, and exact terms so that<br />

anyone having ordinary skill in the field will be readily<br />

able to make and use it. While a statute requires you to<br />

disclose the best mode for carrying out the invention,<br />

you should disclose all possible modes (embodiments)<br />

without indicating any preference, unless the PTO<br />

requires you to do so.<br />

Inventor’s Commandment 12<br />

In your patent application, you should “sell” your<br />

invention to the examiner or anyone else who may<br />

read the application. State all the disadvantages of<br />

the prior art factually and the advantages of one or<br />

more embodiments (not the invention per se) in a<br />

nonlimiting way.<br />

New <strong>Patent</strong> Revision Pending<br />

As this edition goes to press (winter 2010) a complete<br />

revision of the patent statutes is pending. Other revision<br />

bills have been introduced in previous Congresses but<br />

were derailed because of protests by independent<br />

inventors, Nobel laureates, friends of the patent system,<br />

concerned legislators, labor unions, “green” advocates,<br />

and the drug companies, who prefer strong patents. The<br />

current bill adds a new wrinkle in that it would provide<br />

a three-tier examination system (quick examination for<br />

a high fee, regular examination for a moderate fee, and<br />

deferral of examination until a fee is paid). Complete<br />

information about the current bill and the arguments<br />

against its provisions can be found on the Professional<br />

Inventors’ Alliance site (www.PIAUSA.org).<br />

While the proposed bill has some provisions that<br />

would help independent inventors, it also has some<br />

provisions I consider harmful. I urge you to visit the above<br />

site and call or write your congressperson and senators<br />

and urge them to oppose the harmful parts of this bill.<br />

The PIA site, above, will post updated information. You<br />

can also find current information on these issues at Nolo’s<br />

website at www.nolo.com/patentityourself and at my<br />

update site, www.<strong>Patent</strong><strong>It</strong><strong>Yourself</strong>Updates.Blogspot.com.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!