16.05.2014 Views

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ChaPter 15 | After Your PATENT ISSUES: Use, MAINTENANCE, and INFRINGEMENT | 429<br />

it. Remember, if you don’t infringe the independent<br />

claims, you won’t have to worry about the dependent<br />

claims. (See Chapters 9 and 13, and Section J, above.)<br />

4. If No In-Force <strong>Patent</strong> Is Applicable<br />

Unless there is an in-force patent covering an item, anyone<br />

is free to make and manufacture identical copies of it,<br />

provided:<br />

• one doesn’t copy the trademark of the product<br />

• the shape of the product itself is not considered a<br />

trademark (such as the shape of the Fotomat huts), and<br />

• you don’t copy “secondary meaning” features. (See<br />

Chapter 1.)<br />

If you buy a product from another in the course of<br />

business, your vendor is obligated to indemnify you for any<br />

such infringement under the Uniform Commercial Code.<br />

However, you can be sued for infringement and be liable<br />

for damages. (Hopefully, your vendor will be around to<br />

reimburse you.) You can also be subject to an injunction<br />

ordering you not to infringe any more.<br />

One manufacturer’s effort to copy a small hardware item<br />

by having it manufactured cheaply in the Orient backfired.<br />

He sent the item overseas with instructions to make several<br />

thousand identical copies of the item. Since he didn’t give<br />

any further instructions, the Oriental manufacturer did<br />

as instructed, manufacturing and shipping back several<br />

thousand copies of the item, including a faithful copy of<br />

the embossed trademark of the manufacturer’s competitor.<br />

The manufacturer then had to spend significant money<br />

obliterating the trademark, thereby losing his entire profit<br />

in the process.<br />

L. Citing Prior Art Against <strong>Patent</strong><br />

Applications and <strong>Patent</strong>s<br />

Suppose you’re aware of prior art that would affect a patent<br />

or patent application and you want to make the PTO or<br />

the public aware. Perhaps you want to get the art in the<br />

file of your own patent or application to get it behind you<br />

and show your good faith and put forth your arguments<br />

as to why it doesn’t invalidate your claims. Or maybe you<br />

are manufacturing (or contemplating manufacturing)<br />

something based on the invention and you don’t want<br />

someone to get a patent on it. Or possibly you just want to<br />

do it as a public service to prevent an improper patent from<br />

issuing or cast a cloud on a patent you know was improperly<br />

issued. How do you apprise the PTO or the public of this<br />

prior art?<br />

There are five ways that you can cite prior art relevant to<br />

your own or someone else’s patent or patent application:<br />

1. File a passive citation against your own patent<br />

application (Rule 97).<br />

2. File a passive citation against a published patent<br />

application (Rule 99).<br />

3. File a protest against a pending application (Rule 291).<br />

4. File a passive citation against a patent (Rule 501).<br />

5. Request a reexamination (Rules 510 and 902).<br />

Let’s examine each of these in more detail.<br />

1. File a Passive Citation Against Your<br />

Own <strong>Patent</strong> Application (Rule 97)<br />

As part of your “duty of disclosure” under Rule 97 you are<br />

required to provide an Information Disclosure Statement<br />

(IDS) in which you cite prior art that you are (or become)<br />

aware of, against your own application. (I include it here<br />

for the sake of completeness. There is no fee if you timely<br />

file the IDS. For more information, see Chapter 10, Section<br />

G.) Once your patent issues, this obligation ends, although<br />

it would be considered highly improper and subject you to<br />

sanctions to sue on a patent that you know is invalid.<br />

2. File a Passive Citation Against a Published<br />

<strong>Patent</strong> Application (Rule 99)<br />

Under Rule 99, anyone can cite prior art against a published<br />

patent application. The PTO will enter the citation in the<br />

application file if it includes a fee (see Appendix 4, Fee<br />

Schedule), a list of the citations, and a copy of each citation.<br />

(The relevant portions of non-English citations must be<br />

translated.) A copy of the citation must be sent to (served<br />

upon) the applicant. The person filing the citation should<br />

not explain the relevance of the citations. There is no fee,<br />

but the citation must be filed within two months after the<br />

application is published or prior to a Notice of Allowance,<br />

whichever is earlier.<br />

3. File a Protest Against a Pending<br />

Application (Rule 291)<br />

Under Rule 291, anyone can protest any pending application<br />

before it has been published or allowed. The protest must<br />

be filed with the PTO (no fee required) and a copy must be<br />

served upon the applicant. If the protestor does not know<br />

the address of the applicant, they must file two copies with<br />

the PTO. If the protest is made on the basis of prior art, it<br />

must include a list of the prior art, copies of the art, and an

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!