16.05.2014 Views

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

Patent It Yourself - PDF Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ChAPtER 15 | AFTER YOUR PATENT ISSUES: USE, MAINTENANCE, AND INFRINGEMENT | 417<br />

considerable clout to get a federal statute enacted which<br />

exempts health care providers (for instance, doctors,<br />

nurses, and hospitals) from liability for performing medical<br />

procedures covered by in-force patents. (35 USC 287(c).)<br />

In view of this statute, it no longer makes sense to patent<br />

medical procedures, as such. However, the statute still<br />

allows patent owners to sue health care providers for any<br />

activity that infringes a patent on (a) a device, (b) a drug, (c)<br />

the use of a drug or device, or (d) a biotechnology process<br />

invention.<br />

While this medical proceedings exemption statute is<br />

well-intentioned, most patent practitioners believe that it<br />

stifles innovation. An example will show why. A client of<br />

mine invented a new and promising ophthalmic technique<br />

that would help sight-impaired persons. He needed funding<br />

to develop it. When he asked me to prepare a patent<br />

application on it, I told him about the new law. He realized<br />

that even if he got a patent, he would not be able to enforce<br />

it against any medical practitioners who used the technique.<br />

He also realized that any patent he got would be worthless.<br />

Since it would not pay to develop it unless he could get a<br />

proprietary position, he dropped it and the world will not<br />

have the benefit of his potentially valuable innovation. Thus,<br />

many people with impaired vision who could have been<br />

helped will have to live with their impairment.<br />

G. Be Wary of Offers to Provide<br />

Information About Your <strong>Patent</strong><br />

Soon after being awarded a patent, a client of mine received<br />

an offer by mail, advising that an “article” about her<br />

patent was published and offering to send her a copy of the<br />

article for $3.95. After anxiously sending in her money,<br />

she received the “article,” a photocopy of a page from the<br />

PTO’s Official Gazette, showing the usual main drawing<br />

figure and claim of her patent! Fortunately she was able<br />

to obtain a refund by threatening to call in the FTC and<br />

postal inspectors, but you may not be so lucky; new rackets<br />

originate all the time.<br />

Another offer very frequently received by patentees,<br />

usually about a year or more after their patent issues, comes<br />

as a postcard, such as in Fig. 15A.<br />

I believe this offer has marginal utility to most inventors,<br />

and at a very high cost. I wouldn’t accept the offer, since<br />

almost all patents in which earlier patents are cited as<br />

references are very different and extremely unlikely to<br />

be of any value to the owner of the earlier patent. You<br />

can obtain the same service free on the PTO’s site (www.<br />

uspto.gov) by clicking <strong>Patent</strong>s, then SEARCH, then <strong>Patent</strong><br />

Number Search, then enter the number of your patent, then<br />

Important Notice<br />

To: Owners of U.S. <strong>Patent</strong> # 4688283<br />

Assignor<br />

Our search of your U.S. patent shows the [#]<br />

most recent patents, issued after your patent, that the<br />

U.S. <strong>Patent</strong> Office has classified identically or crossreferenced<br />

in the same class and subclass as your patent.<br />

You may want to determine if your patent dominates<br />

the later patents, the activity of competitors, and the<br />

latest state of the art.<br />

For each of the later-issued patents we will send you<br />

the patent no., an abstract, a drawing, plus addressinformation<br />

on the inventor, and/or the owner or<br />

manufacturer for $1.00 each, plus a service charge of<br />

$60.00 if you return THIS CARD (or a copy) with your<br />

payment of $96.00. Make check or money order to<br />

(Name)<br />

payable on a U.S. Bank.<br />

Or send $60.00 for a list of later patent numbers.<br />

CD 60<br />

1-2-3-4-1 Providing <strong>Patent</strong> Information Since 1976 1-2-3-4-2<br />

Fig. 15A—Postcard Offer of Dubious Value<br />

click Referenced By. The site will then display a list of all<br />

subsequent patents that cite yours.<br />

A third offer is the “<strong>Patent</strong> Certificate.” This offer is<br />

sent to many patentees in an official-looking letter from<br />

Washington, marked “U.S. <strong>Patent</strong> Certificate,” “For Official<br />

Use Only” (next to the postage stamp), and “Important<br />

<strong>Patent</strong> Information.” In reality, it’s from a private company<br />

that wants to sell you a nicely framed version of your patent.<br />

Needless to say, this product has no official value.<br />

A fourth offer, definitely of questionable value, also<br />

comes on a postcard that states something similar to<br />

the following: “Our search of your patent has located X<br />

companies that manufacture, market, or sell products in<br />

a field allied to your invention.” <strong>It</strong> offers to sell you the<br />

names of the X companies for a stiff fee, usually about $80.<br />

If you want to find the names of the companies that are in<br />

a similar field, I strongly advise that you save your money.<br />

Instead take a trip to a store or library where you’ll find<br />

plenty of suitable companies for free. (Use the techniques<br />

outlined in Chapter 11.)<br />

A fifth offer is to include you in a compendium of<br />

inventors, such as a “Who’s Who” of inventors, or an<br />

offer to sell you such a volume with your name included.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!