27.07.2014 Views

HILLINGDON UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - London Borough ...

HILLINGDON UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - London Borough ...

HILLINGDON UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - London Borough ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

transportation options to meet community needs which cannot be satisfied by identification of resources<br />

within the Plan area itself.<br />

Minerals<br />

13.5 Hillingdon's remaining deposits are a finite resource; worked at a moderate rate they will<br />

contribute to local sand and gravel and inert waste disposal requirements for the longest practicable period.<br />

If released at a faster rate they would contribute to a wider need in the short-term but would be used up<br />

faster, accelerating the ultimately inevitable point when all aggregates have to be obtained from further<br />

away at the cost of extra long distance traffic and extra pollution. A lower production rate minimises<br />

environmental disruption at the time but spreads it over a longer period, possibly creating undesirable<br />

lengthy periods of uncertainty and planning 'blight'. A balance has to be sought as successive generations<br />

face increasingly difficult decisions as the less sensitive deposits become worked out but demand continues<br />

unabated.<br />

13.6 Release of deposits in more sensitive locations can only be justified where day-to-day<br />

management standards are very high and the prospects of a rapid return of sites to a high quality condition<br />

suitable for an economically viable beneficial after use are assured. Some mineral working has made a<br />

positive contribution to a changed landscape and alternative uses. For example, much of the character and<br />

quality of the Colne Valley Park arises from the creation of lakes, some of which have been designated as<br />

Sites of Special Scientific Interest. Future opportunities of this kind are limited because most remaining<br />

sand and gravel is in the south of the <strong>Borough</strong>, which has a lower water table and presents some problems<br />

in relation to potential 'birdstrike' hazard to aircraft using Heathrow and to helicopters overflying.<br />

13.7 The flat topography and lack of natural screening features in the south of the <strong>Borough</strong> requires<br />

particular care in the organisation of workings which can be highly visible and severely intrusive.<br />

Although mineral working is a 'temporary' use of land its effects on individuals can be long-term,<br />

frequently extending over many years. Workings may not only be intrusive themselves but delay or<br />

uncertainty over future operations can extensively blight an area or property.<br />

13.8 Larger sites give an operator greater commitment and provide the best chance of securing an<br />

orderly phasing of working and of locating plant, access and other facilities in the least sensitive locations.<br />

In addition they provide a measure of assurance about future production and remove the necessity for the<br />

local authority, residents and the industry to devote resources to periodic discussion of what are frequently<br />

the same issues. As a result they minimise blight by providing a higher degree of assurance about future<br />

working and they minimise sterilisation of reserves in margins within the area concerned. The Council<br />

would favour a comprehensive approach as opposed to fragmented or piecemeal proposals where this<br />

would provide a discernibly better scheme.<br />

The Relationship with Strategic Minerals Policy<br />

13.9 The Department of the Environment issues guidance on broad strategies which Minerals<br />

Planning Authorities are strongly advised to implement. Minerals Planning Guidance Note 1 (MPG1)<br />

states: 'In relation to aggregates full consideration should be given to the conclusions of the Regional<br />

Aggregates Working Parties and Guidelines issued by the Secretaries of State.' The current Guidelines are<br />

set out in MPG6 'Guidelines for Aggregates Provision in England' (published April 1994 and based on<br />

1985-1992 data). The strategy of MPG6 is based on a general decrease in the proportion of supply of<br />

aggregates from primary land won sources up to 2006, with the balance of steadily rising demand<br />

throughout that period being met by greater use of marine dredged sand and gravel 'imports' of aggregates<br />

from other Regions and recycled materials. This renders the role of Hillingdon's rail aggregates depots<br />

(and marine wharves elsewhere) progressively more important as <strong>London</strong>'s own land-won production<br />

declines.<br />

13.10 MPG6 currently states 'a sufficient stock of permitted reserves (a landbank) should be<br />

maintained for all aggregate minerals. The aim should be to provide for the release of land to maintain a<br />

stock of permissions, for an appropriate local area, sufficient for at least seven years extraction unless<br />

<strong>London</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> of Hillingdon Unitary Development Plan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!