HILLINGDON UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - London Borough ...
HILLINGDON UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - London Borough ...
HILLINGDON UNITARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN - London Borough ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Accordingly the Council will consider the effect which proposals could have on the flood plain and water<br />
table. There is consequently a need for future schemes to provide clear evidence that the substitution of<br />
permeable gravels with impermeable waste will not result in hydrogeological problems occurring once site<br />
restoration is completed. As an alternative the Minerals Planning Authority will consider schemes for<br />
water table level monitoring which incorporate feasible solutions to incipient problems that may arise if<br />
significant increases in the water table are found to occur subsequently around the site as work progresses<br />
and once the land has been restored.<br />
MIN21 THE MINERALS <strong>PLAN</strong>NING AUTHORITY CONSIDERS THE LONG TERM<br />
IMPACT OF LANDFILLING ON THE LOCAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL REGIME TO BE A<br />
MATERIAL CONSIDERATION. APPLICANTS SHOULD PROVIDE CLEAR EVIDENCE TO<br />
ENABLE THE IMPACT OF PROPOSALS ON THE LOCAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL REGIME<br />
TO BE DETERMINED. ANY PROPOSALS SHOULD PROVIDE FOR THE MONITORING OF<br />
THE WATER TABLE DURING EXTRACTION/LANDFILLING, AND ONCE RESTORATION IS<br />
COMPLETED, AND IN APPROPRIATE CASES INCLUDE MITIGATING MEASURES TO BE<br />
PUT INTO AFFECT IF ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE LOCAL HYDROGEOLOGICAL<br />
REGIME DEVELOP. IT WILL NORMALLY BE NECESSARY TO ENTER INTO AN<br />
APPROPRIATE LEGAL AGREEMENT, HAVING REGARD TO THE CONTINUING NEED TO<br />
MAINTAIN MONITORING AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR THE DURATION THAT<br />
THEY ARE CONSIDERED NECESSARY.<br />
Buffer Zones Between Excavation and Landfill and Adjoining Sensitive Land Uses<br />
13.43 Most future mineral working is likely to affect the higher grades of agricultural land, sports fields<br />
or other areas demanding very high restoration standards. Such workings require clean inert fill for<br />
restoration and experience has demonstrated that this offers the best chances of operations being conducted<br />
without serious long-term adverse effects on adjacent land or premises. Policy MIN22 meets this case but<br />
distances given will need to be increased where it is insufficient to secure compliance with other policies or<br />
where the material being handled is more likely to create environmental problems. Prevailing wind<br />
direction will be an additional factor to take into account, requiring increased distances downwind. It<br />
assumes that the provision of graded, grassed and planted screen banks usually 3 to 4m high will be<br />
provided at all sensitive locations.<br />
MIN22 NO <strong>DEVELOPMENT</strong> INVOLVING THE DISPOSAL OF WASTE SHALL NORMALLY<br />
BE NEARER THAN A MINIMUM OF 60 METRES TO ANY BUILDING USED AS A<br />
DWELLING, SCHOOL, HOSPITAL OR FOR SIMILAR PURPOSES; NOR SHOULD IT BE<br />
WITHIN 15 METRES OF THE CURTILAGE OF SUCH A BUILDING WHERE REASONABLE<br />
ENJOYMENT OF THAT CURTILAGE WOULD BE PREJUDICED. SCREEN BANKS OR<br />
OTHER MEASURES FOR DUST CONTROL OR NOISE ATTENUATION MAY BE PROVIDED<br />
WITHIN THE BUFFER ZONE WHERE THE MINERALS <strong>PLAN</strong>NING AUTHORITY IS<br />
SATISFIED THAT THIS COULD REASONABLY BE CARRIED OUT WITHOUT THEM<br />
CAUSING UNDUE DETRIMENT TO AMENITY THEMSELVES.<br />
Assessment of Noise at Mineral Working and Landfill Sites<br />
13.44 Minerals can only be excavated where they are found and although noise emission is inevitable it<br />
can have a significant impact on the environment and the quality of life of communities. The Council is<br />
concerned to ensure that noise levels are kept to the minimum practicable level consistent with good<br />
environmental practice and the efficient and economic working sites. Applicants for planning consent for<br />
mineral extraction or waste disposal will be expected to submit a noise assessment having full regard to<br />
MPG 11 ‘The Control of Noise at Surface Mineral Workings’ (April 1993), as well as existing British<br />
Standards and current best practice. It involves establishing the exisitng noise climate of the locality and<br />
the likely future noise climate with the proposed development. It also states that to predict the likely level<br />
of noise from a proposed development, British Standard 5228, Part 1 (1984) ‘Noise Control on Contruction<br />
and Open Sites’ should form the basis for the noise prediction model and modifications may be necessary<br />
to take account of particular circumstances of mineral sites. The Minerals Planning Authority considers<br />
<strong>London</strong> <strong>Borough</strong> of Hillingdon Unitary Development Plan