28.10.2014 Views

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>CDOT</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Business</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

Section 3 of this report recommends three measures related to congestion – one<br />

based on the percent of person miles traveled (PMT) on congested corridors, one<br />

on person delay, and another one based on travel time reliability. The first<br />

measure is designed to work with <strong>CDOT</strong>’s existing data, and <strong>CDOT</strong> is working<br />

to develop the second and third. The first measure is based on comparing a<br />

highway segment’s traffic volume to its capacity. Developing a cost/benefit<br />

curve would require estimating the change in a highway segment’s capacity that<br />

could be achieved by implementing a project. This calculation is relatively<br />

straightforward for capacity expansion projects but not technically feasible for<br />

operations projects.<br />

Given that the mobility curve should focus on operations projects and that it is<br />

not possible to relate operations projects directly to a highway’s capacity, it is<br />

recommended that <strong>CDOT</strong> hold off on developing a mobility cost/benefit curve<br />

until a measure of reliability is developed.<br />

When the details of delay and reliability measures have been resolved, a<br />

cost/benefit curve could be developed using a project-level approach. This<br />

approach would require <strong>CDOT</strong> to define a list of potential operations projects<br />

and to estimate the following information for each:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Project cost;<br />

Value of the reliability measure on the project segment without the project;<br />

and<br />

Value of the reliability measure on the project segment with the project.<br />

In addition, the projects would need to be ranked from highest to lowest priority.<br />

The prioritization could be done based on cost effectiveness (e.g., change in<br />

reliability per dollar) or using a more comprehensive approach. Once the list has<br />

been prioritized, a cost/benefit curve could be created as follows:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Assume a funding level;<br />

Work down the list of prioritized projects until these funds are expended;<br />

Calculate the cumulative change in reliability expected for the funded set of<br />

projects;<br />

Plot the resulting value; and<br />

Repeat this process for additional funding levels.<br />

6-4 <strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Systematics</strong>, Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!