CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan Organizational Performance 7. On Time Construction Existing Measure: The percent of construction projects being delivered on time is currently tracked and reported by CDOT and included in the Chief Engineer’s Objectives and the FHWA-CDOT stewardship agreement. CDOT is moving towards defining "on time" delivery as occurring when a project is completed within the period specified in the contract after the pre-construction conference. Recommendation: Recommended modification to this measure is to assign a letter grade based on the thresholds below. A potential alternative for this measure is to base it on information provided in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Measuring against the STIP would enable CDOT to assess performance against the public’s expectations, which are often established by the project timing information provided in the STIP. Options include using a project’s original completion year, as first specified in the STIP as the definition of on time; and assessing the degree to which progress has been made on a project in each year specified in the STIP. Letter grades are based on the following thresholds for percent of on time projects: Grade Threshold A 90 – 100 B 80 – 89 C 70 – 79 D 60 – 69 F < 60 Current Value: 72.2% Value Based on Recommendation: Owner: Scott McDaniel C Required Data Item Source Owner Project identifier for projects completed in previous quarter SAP Projects System Module Completion date for each project SAP Projects System Module TBD Project completion data specified in the contract after SAP Projects System Module TBD the pre-construction period for each project TBD Unit of Measure: Grade 3-18 Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
CDOT Performance Data Business Plan Calculation: 1. For each project completed in the previous quarter, flag as “on-time” if it was completed within the period specified in the contract after the preconstruction conference. 2. Calculate percent on time as follows: # 100 # 3. Convert the result to a letter grade using the thresholds defined above. Update Frequency: Quarterly Additional Notes: None 8. On Budget Construction Existing Measure: The percent of construction projects being delivered on budget is currently tracked and reported by CDOT and included in the Chief Engineer’s Objectives and the FHWA-CDOT stewardship agreement. A project is considered to be “on budget” if it is completed within the project commitment amount. Recommendation: Recommended modification to this measure is to weight the measure by project cost, and assign a letter grade based on the thresholds below. Letter grades are based on the following thresholds for percent of on budget projects: Grade Threshold A 90 – 100 B 80 – 89 C 70 – 79 D 60 – 69 F < 60 Current Value: 92.9% Value Based on Recommendation: A Owner: Scott McDaniel Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 3-19
Page 3: final report CDOT Performance Data
Page 7: CDOT Performance Data Business Plan
Page 10 and 11: List of Figures, continued vi Cambr
Page 12 and 13: CDOT Performance Data Business Plan
Page 81 and 82: 5.0 External Reporting Dashboard CD
Page 85 and 86:
CDOT Performance Data Business Plan
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 109:
Figure 5.18 CDOT Dashboard Example
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 119 and 120:
Appendices A. Additional Data Colle
Page 121 and 122:
Appendices Recognize and Plan
Page 123:
Appendices Improved communication
Page 126 and 127:
Appendices Planning Ext Planning In
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Appendices Person, Ron, Balanced Sc
Page 140 and 141:
Appendices CDOT is required to rep
Page 142 and 143:
Appendices How and when they ar
Page 144 and 145:
Appendices If measures reported by
Page 146 and 147:
Appendices INTEGRATE REGIONAL AND S
Page 148 and 149:
Appendices Maintain or improve
Page 151 and 152:
Appendices F. Sample Data Governanc
Page 153 and 154:
Appendices G. Congestion The report
Page 155 and 156:
Appendices Table G-1 Revised Segmen
Page 157 and 158:
Appendices Results The following ta
Page 159 and 160:
Appendices Figure G-1 Speed Eastbou
Page 161 and 162:
Appendices Figure G-5 Speed Westbou
Page 163 and 164:
Appendices A useful format for the
Page 165 and 166:
Appendices Figure G-13 AM Peak PTI
Page 167 and 168:
Appendices H. Calculation Spreadshe
Page 169 and 170:
Appendices Cambridge Systematics, I
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
show all

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?