28.10.2014 Views

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendices<br />

for the development of data standards for data definitions, means of<br />

collection, and format.<br />

<strong>Data</strong> Assessment<br />

In order to support performance measurement efforts effectively, data programs<br />

must be carefully evaluated in terms of their ability to meet overall agency and<br />

stakeholder goals. For example, traffic and safety data programs must produce<br />

quality data to support decision-making regarding safety and mobility projects.<br />

The section assists in performing a health assessment of data systems to<br />

determine where the most critical deficiencies exist and to develop a strategy for<br />

addressing those deficiencies.<br />

In general, criteria must be developed to assess the data programs. An example<br />

of the type of criteria that could be used were initially identified for use with the<br />

FHWA’s Traffic <strong>Data</strong> Quality Management Report and are applicable, as well,<br />

for assessing quality of data used for performance measurement. These criteria<br />

include the following:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Accuracy. The measure of degree of agreement between data values or sets of<br />

values and a source assumed to be correct. It is also defined as a qualitative<br />

assessment of freedom from error, with a high assessment corresponding to a<br />

small error.<br />

Completeness (also referred to as availability). The degree to which data<br />

values are present in the attributes (e.g., volume and speed are attributes of<br />

traffic) that require them. Completeness is typically described in terms of<br />

percentages or number of data values and measures how much data is<br />

available compared to how much data should be available.<br />

Validity. The degree to which data values satisfy acceptance requirements of<br />

the validation criteria or fall within the respective domain of acceptable<br />

values. <strong>Data</strong> validity can be expressed in numerous ways. One common way<br />

is to indicate the percentage of data values that either pass or fail data<br />

validity checks.<br />

Timeliness. The degree to which data values or a set of values are provided<br />

at the time required or specified. Timeliness can be expressed in absolute or<br />

relative terms. This also can be referred to as latency.<br />

Coverage. The degree to which data values in a sample accurately represent<br />

the whole of that which is to be measured. As with other measures, coverage<br />

can be expressed in absolute or relative units.<br />

Accessibility (also referred to as usability). The relative ease with which<br />

data can be retrieved and manipulated by data consumers to meet their<br />

needs. Accessibility can be expressed in qualitative or quantitative terms.<br />

<strong>Data</strong> Management<br />

While managing data within data programs, it is important to do the following:<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Systematics</strong>, Inc. A-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!