CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics
CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics
CDOT Performance Data Business Plan - Cambridge Systematics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendices<br />
The two most important delivery measures are on-time and on-budget:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Options for on time include obligating money (same as advertising project), starting<br />
project, and completing project. Highest priority for <strong>CDOT</strong> is advertisement date<br />
(consistent with previous interview).<br />
Public is most interested in: contract estimated completion, actual completion and<br />
reason for difference. The following should be measured: 1. How well did <strong>CDOT</strong> do<br />
the estimate? 2. Was it met? 3. Reasons if not.<br />
Good milestones to track would be: 1. Is budget set up before going to bid? 2. Was<br />
there a change in budget after bid? 3. If changes occurred – are they justified? 4.<br />
What was the final budget? The fundamental data is already in SAP to track these 4<br />
– the dates just need to be tightened.<br />
The ideal on-time budget would have thresholds for “on-time” that vary by project<br />
type. For example, a resurfacing project could be 1 month within the ad date, while<br />
a bigger project could be 2-3 months.<br />
The target for an on-time measure based on ad date should not be 100 percent. This<br />
would indicate that staff is too conservative in their estimates. For this measure, a<br />
tight definition and process for when/how to calculate it are critical. For example,<br />
on time could be defined as project ad within 30 days of current ad date. An ideal<br />
measure might be project-based, e.g., percent of projects on-time, or percent of<br />
projects on-time weighted by project cost.<br />
General<br />
An audit of PMs was conducted and it was found that the data was not checked.<br />
<strong>CDOT</strong> needs to do better measuring program level and connection between federal and<br />
financing (e.g., how was money spent and what did we get for it?).<br />
Need set rules in place for commonly reported data – e.g. there are different ways of reporting<br />
(centerline miles, lane miles, two directions etc.).<br />
Need an annual “publication” from IRIS to send to SAP.<br />
Need to be able to drill down on measure so a person can see how their performance objectives<br />
link to those of the work unit, division and Department.<br />
Reporting needs to be more outcome oriented (e.g. rather than focusing on whether a bid was<br />
on time – what was the quality of the work?<br />
Regions<br />
There appears to be a disconnect between project decisions made in regions and the<br />
performance measures reported by <strong>CDOT</strong>. It is important for regions to buy into future<br />
measures and feel a sense of accountability for them.<br />
It is a good idea to break down the measures by region. The more information, the better for<br />
the decision makers.<br />
<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Systematics</strong>, Inc. D-5