21.11.2014 Views

o_1977r8vv9vk1ts2ms0kd8pksa.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 D. Maulik<br />

on standing, there was no change in the S/D ratio in<br />

normotensive patients when they were moved to the<br />

upright position. In contrast, the ratio significantly<br />

increased with a postural change in hypertensive patients<br />

and was more pronounced with high resistance<br />

hypertension.<br />

Maternal Exercise and Umbilical<br />

Arterial Doppler Indices<br />

The fetal circulatory response to maternal hemodynamic<br />

stress secondary to maternal exercise may be<br />

an important consideration when timing a fetal Doppler<br />

investigation. Several investigators have addressed<br />

this issue [49±51]. All of these studies, which employed<br />

some form of bicycle ergometry, demonstrated an exercise-induced<br />

response in the maternal cardiovascular<br />

system. The fetal cardiac chronotropic response was<br />

variable. Often the response was tachycardia, although<br />

a lack of variation was also noted. Most studies failed to<br />

show changes in the umbilical arterial Doppler indices.<br />

When such changes were noted, they were associated<br />

with fetal heart rate alterations. From these investigations<br />

it appears that mild to moderate exercise does<br />

not affect flow impedance in the umbilical artery independent<br />

of changes in the fetal heart rate.<br />

Summary<br />

The umbilical arterial circulation is readily accessible<br />

to continuous-wave and pulsed-wave Doppler interrogation.<br />

The procedure is relatively simple. The variance<br />

of umbilical arterial Doppler indices is affected<br />

by both hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic factors.<br />

The latter represent the error component of the measurement<br />

and are attributable to observer and probably<br />

instrumental factors. The hemodynamic factors<br />

include physiologic and pathologic phenomena. Of<br />

the former, the gestational age, fetal breathing, fetal<br />

heart rate, and site of measurement are the most important<br />

contributors.<br />

References<br />

1. Maulik D, Yarlagadda P, Youngblood JP, Ciston P<br />

(1991) Comparative efficacy of umbilical arterial Doppler<br />

indices for predicting adverse perinatal outcome.<br />

Am J Obstet Gynecol 164:1434±1440<br />

2. Maulik D, Yarlagadda AP, Youngblood JP, Willoughby L<br />

(1989) Components of variability of umbilical arterial<br />

Doppler velocimetry: a prospective analysis. Am J Obstet<br />

Gynecol 160:1406±1412<br />

3. Schulman H, Fleischer A, Stern W et al (1984) Umbilical<br />

velocity wave ratios in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet<br />

Gynecol 148:985±990<br />

4. Nienhuis SJ, van Vugt JM, Hoogland HJ, Ruissen CJ, de<br />

Haan J (1988) Interexaminer variability of fetal Doppler<br />

velocity waveforms. Gynecol Obstet Invest 25:152±157<br />

5. Gudmundsson S, Fairlie F, Lingman G, Marsal K (1990)<br />

Recording of blood flow velocity waveforms in the<br />

uteroplacental and umbilical circulation: reproducibility<br />

study and comparison of pulsed and continuous wave<br />

Doppler ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 18:97±101<br />

6. Davies JA, Lee A, Spencer JA (1990) Variability of continuous-wave<br />

Doppler flow velocity waveform indices<br />

from the umbilical artery. Obstet Gynecol 76:366±399<br />

7. Scherjon SA, Kok JH, Oosting H, Zondervan HA<br />

(1993) Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of<br />

the pulsatility index calculated from pulsed Doppler<br />

flow velocity waveforms in three fetal vessels. Br J Obstet<br />

Gynaecol 100:134±138<br />

8. Brar HS, Medearis AL, De Vore GR, Platt LD (1988) Fetal<br />

umbilical velocimetry using continuous-wave and<br />

pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies:<br />

a comparison of systolic to diastolic ratios. Obstet<br />

Gynecol 72:607±612<br />

9. Mehalek KE, Berkowitz GS, Chitkara U, Rosenberg J,<br />

Berkowitz RL (1988) Comparison of continuous-wave<br />

and pulsed Doppler S/D ratios of umbilical and uterine<br />

arteries. Obstet Gynecol 72:603±606<br />

10. Chan FY, Pun TC, Lee CP et al (1991) A comparative<br />

study of continuous- and pulsed-wave Doppler velocimetry<br />

in fetal and uteroplacental circulation. J Ultrasound<br />

Med 10:277±280<br />

11. Van Vugt JM, Ruissen CJ, Nienhuis SJ, Hoogland HJ, de<br />

Hann J (1988) Comparison of blood velocity waveform<br />

indices recorded by pulsed Doppler and continuous<br />

wave Doppler in the umbilical artery. J Clin Ultrasound<br />

16:573±576<br />

12. Jorn H, Fendel H, Christ B (1991) Ein Vergleich<br />

zwischen einfachen Dopplermethoden (kontinuierlicher<br />

oder gepulster Doppler) und dem Duplex-System<br />

(Kombination von B-Bild und gepulstem Doppler). Z<br />

Geburtshilfe Perinatol 195:107<br />

13. Gaziano EP, Knox GF, Wager GP, Bendel RP, Olson JD<br />

(1990) Pulsed Doppler umbilical artery waveforms: significance<br />

of elevated umbilical artery systolic/diastolic<br />

ratios in the normally grown fetus. Obstet Gynecol<br />

75:189±195<br />

14. Abramowicz JS, Warsof SL, Arrington J, Levy DL<br />

(1989) Doppler analysis of the umbilical artery: the importance<br />

of choosing the placental end of the cord. J<br />

Ultrasound Med 8:219±221<br />

15. Mehalek KE, Rosenberg J, Berkowitz GS, Chitkara U,<br />

Berkowitz RL (1989) Umbilical and uterine artery flow<br />

velocity waveforms: effect of the sampling site on Doppler<br />

ratios. J Ultrasound Med 8:171±176<br />

16. Vieyres P, Durand A, Patat F et al (1991) Influence of<br />

the measurement location on the resistance index in<br />

the umbilical arteries: a hemodynamic approach. J Ultrasound<br />

Med 10:671±675<br />

17. Ruissen CJ, von Drongelen MM, Hoogland HJ, Jager W,<br />

Hoeks AP (1990) Characteristics of the umbilical artery<br />

velocity waveform as function of measurement site. Gynecol<br />

Obstet Invest 30:212±216<br />

18. FitzGerald DE, Stuart B, Drumm JE, Duignan NM<br />

(1984) The assessment of fetoplacental circulation with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!