21.11.2014 Views

o_1977r8vv9vk1ts2ms0kd8pksa.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 P. Arbeille et al.<br />

moglobin content lower than 5 g/100 ml was closely associated<br />

with fetal flow redistribution and abnormal<br />

FHR. On the other hand, the occurrence of abnormal<br />

FHR was associated with C/U 7 days)<br />

70% of the fetuses were premature, 70% had abnormal<br />

FHR at delivery (several weeks later), C/U<br />

decreased by ±14 Ô 6%, and the mean HI was equal to<br />

±187 Ô 54. (Fig. 13.10).<br />

A second similar study performed in 1996 in the<br />

same area and using the same protocol showed only<br />

a short crisis (150% was predictive of abnormal<br />

FHR at delivery with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity<br />

of 85%.<br />

The HI allowed prediction of abnormal FHR at delivery<br />

several weeks in advance. Moreover, the lower<br />

amplitude of the hemodynamic response (lower HI)<br />

in the second group associated with a lower rate of<br />

abnormal FHR was likely related to an improvement<br />

in pregnancy recruitment and management or with<br />

the acquisition of an adapted immunity by the<br />

mother.<br />

C/U Ratio in Non-Reversible Hypoxia<br />

(Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension)<br />

Prediction of Abnormal FHR at Delivery<br />

In a study of fetal cerebral and umbilical flow adaptation<br />

in pregnancies complicated by hypertension,<br />

which included 82% with IUGR, the fetal hemodynamics<br />

were monitored every 2 days by Doppler over<br />

several days from admission until delivery [59]. As<br />

flow redistribution was identified at its early stage<br />

both the intensity and the duration of the flow redistribution<br />

period (hypoxic period) were considered<br />

for predicting the occurrence of abnormal FHR. By<br />

the end of the study the limit for the HI was 160%.<br />

Figure 13.12 shows a graphic representation of HI<br />

(area between the C/U curve and the C/U=1.1 cut-off<br />

line). This area represents the total oxygen deficit<br />

during the period of observation.<br />

A HI higher than 160% was much more powerful<br />

(PPV: 87%; NPV: 88%) than the final URI, CRI, or<br />

C/U value measured for predicting abnormal FHR at<br />

delivery [URI (PPV: 63%; NPV: 74%) ± CRI (PPV:<br />

59%; NPV: 70%) ± C/U (PPV: 57%; NPV: 92%)].<br />

Moreover, as shown on Fig. 13.12, the C/U may<br />

change from one day to another; thus, a single Doppler<br />

measurement is not sufficient to identify the real<br />

hemodynamic stage induced by hypoxia. On the<br />

other hand, the HI increase is associated with an increase<br />

in the degree of fetal growth restriction as expressed<br />

in percentile. This suggests that the HI, by<br />

measuring the cumulated oxygen deficit during the<br />

observation period, also likely expresses the deficit in<br />

the nutrition supply responsible for the fetal growth<br />

restriction.<br />

Finally, it should be noted that this study addressed<br />

high-risk pregnancy but not very poor fetal<br />

outcomes: 22% of all fetuses required intensive care<br />

assistance (but < 2 days and two-thirds of them<br />

< 33 weeks) and all survived in good health; only one<br />

fetus died at delivery. Thus, HI is a very early predictor<br />

of poor fetal outcome. In contrast, absent end-diastolic<br />

flow in the umbilical arteries was found in 9<br />

cases (13% of the whole population), but all delivered<br />

before 33 weeks; all presented abnormal FHR; all<br />

were severely growth restricted (centile: 6+2); 8<br />

(88%) delivered by Cesarean section; and 5 (56%) required<br />

intensive care assistance. These fetuses presented<br />

the lowest C/U ratio (0.7Ô0.1) and umbilical<br />

cord pO 2 value at delivery (16Ô6) and the highest HI<br />

values (387 Ô 173%) in the population.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!