21.11.2014 Views

o_1977r8vv9vk1ts2ms0kd8pksa.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348 A. Lysikiewicz<br />

selection of the level of measurement outside the bifurcation<br />

of the MCA from the circle of Willis. An insonation<br />

angle of < 308 allows for minimal error.<br />

Other blood flow measurements await clinical validation<br />

before they can be adopted as clinical tools;<br />

some already have been shown to be ineffective. For<br />

example, the umbilical artery blood flow indices are<br />

not informative in alloimmunization and normal values<br />

do not represent useful clinical information. A<br />

study reported by Bilardo et al. [34] found no correlation<br />

between umbilical artery pulsatility index and<br />

fetal anemia. A highly specialized measurement of<br />

flow velocities within the splenic artery requires specific<br />

techniques and experience that may not be universally<br />

available. This method of interrogation has<br />

not been widely used in clinical management. A study<br />

by Dukkler et al. [39] did not show intrahepatic vein<br />

velocity to be more predictive than the MCA peak velocity.<br />

Without reliable estimation of fetal blood vessel<br />

size, attempts to quantitatively measure fetal blood<br />

flow do not yield any new information. In addition,<br />

with no changes in vessel size in the process of fetal<br />

anemia, blood flow measurements will provide no<br />

more information than peak velocities.<br />

Middle cerebral artery peak velocity appears to<br />

contain the most accurate information on fetal circulation<br />

to allow for noninvasive diagnosis of fetal hyperdynamic<br />

circulation in fetal anemia and to select<br />

patients for invasive procedures.<br />

A review by Divakaran included eight primary<br />

studies with 362 pregnancies affected by red cell alloimmunization<br />

evaluated by noninvasive methods. The<br />

cumulative metaanalysis of studies with the highest<br />

methodologic quality reported a positive likelihood<br />

ratio of 8.45 (95% CI 4.69±15.56) and negative likelihood<br />

ratio of 0.02 (95% CI 0.001±0.025) [8]. Although<br />

those results are encouraging, more clinical data may<br />

be needed before Doppler velocimetry will be recommended<br />

as a primary standard evaluation of fetal<br />

anemia.<br />

Diagnostic Invasive Procedures to Detect<br />

Fetal Anemia and Doppler Velocimetry<br />

Diagnostic procedures have to be weighted between<br />

risk of procedure and quality of information obtained<br />

for fetal anemia in alloimmunization.<br />

Amniocentesis is considered a safe procedure with<br />

a complication rate of less than 1%. A major risk in<br />

using this method lies in the low accuracy of predictions.<br />

According to Queenan et al. [5], if used for detection<br />

of fetal anemia in combination with the OD<br />

curve, it is only 89% specific, whereas 21% of anemic<br />

fetuses remain undetected. Frigoletto et al. [50] conservatively<br />

managed 11 zone-III fetuses with no adverse<br />

fetal outcomes. Fetal Doppler velocimetry of the<br />

MCA has the potential to replace amniocentesis in diagnosis<br />

of fetal anemia (Fig. 22.8).<br />

Cordocentesis is the most accurate procedure for<br />

detection of fetal anemia. It is also the most risky of<br />

all procedures with associated fetal loss of 1% [1]<br />

and as high as 4%. If cordocentesis is used as a primary<br />

diagnosis, a large number of fetuses will be exposed<br />

to this risk unnecessarily since only 25% of all<br />

fetuses develop severe anemia requiring fetal blood<br />

transfusion, but all will have multiple cordocenteses<br />

to confirm normal hemoglobin concentration.<br />

With five diagnostic cordocenteses during pregnancy<br />

the cumulative fetal mortality risk may reach<br />

10%±20%, too high for a diagnostic procedure.<br />

Clearly, fetal Doppler velocimetry may not be as<br />

accurate but is safer and should be considered as an<br />

alternative to cordocentesis.<br />

Doppler Monitoring During<br />

Cordocentesis<br />

Fetal Intravascular Transfusions<br />

Accurate estimation of fetal anemia by cordocentesis,<br />

before and after intravascular blood transfusion, can<br />

be compared with Doppler velocimetry and numerous<br />

cross-sectional data sets were obtained in this<br />

fashion.<br />

Fetal MCA Doppler velocimetry can detect fetal<br />

anemia and provide timing for initiation of intravascular<br />

transfusion prior to the development of fetal hydrops.<br />

The role of Doppler velocimetry is to guide<br />

timing of transfusions frequently enough to maintain<br />

sufficient fetal hemoglobin levels, but not too often,<br />

in order to avoid unnecessary risks from the procedure.<br />

Clinical guidance for fetal intravascular transfusions<br />

currently rely on clinical findings and the observation<br />

that fetal hematocrit decreases at the rate of<br />

0.3%±1.0% per day. Using mathematical formulas and<br />

known hematocrit at the time of cordocentesis, an estimate<br />

can be made regarding appropriate amount of<br />

time for repeated intrauterine intravascular fetal<br />

transfusion. Longitudinal Doppler velocimetry assessment<br />

of fetal anemia is the other alternative in guiding<br />

frequency and timing of fetal intravascular transfusions.<br />

Several management schemes have been developed<br />

to guide frequency of transfusions. Less frequent,<br />

larger volume transfusions can be safer by reducing<br />

the total number of fetal intravascular blood transfusions<br />

[51], thereby reducing the risk of fetal blood<br />

volume overload [52]. Use of Doppler velocimetry<br />

during transfusion to assess fetal condition has not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!