21.11.2014 Views

o_1977r8vv9vk1ts2ms0kd8pksa.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

a Chapter 26 Doppler Velocimetry for Fetal Surveillance: Randomized Clinical Trials and Implications for Practice 401<br />

55. Manning FA, Lange IR, Morrison I, Harman CR (1984)<br />

Fetal biophysical profile score and the non-stress test: a<br />

comparative trial. Obstet Gynecol 64:326<br />

56. Platt LD, Walla CA, Paul RH et al (1985) A prospective<br />

trial of fetal biophysical profile vs the non-stress test in<br />

the management of high risk pregnancies. Am J Obstet<br />

Gynecol 153:624<br />

57. Mohide P, Kierse MJNC (1989) Biophysical assessment<br />

of fetal well-being. In: Chalmers I, Enkins M (eds) Effective<br />

Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth. Oxford University<br />

Press, Oxford, p 477<br />

58. Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T et al. (1994) Perinatal<br />

outcome with the modified biophysical profile. Am J<br />

Obstet Gynecol 170:1672±1676<br />

59. Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw SA (1995) A randomized controlled<br />

trial of simple compared with complex antenatal<br />

fetal monitoring after 42 weeks of gestation. Br J Obstet<br />

Gynaecol 102:638±643<br />

60. Alfirevic Z, Neilson JP (2004) Biophysical profile for fetal<br />

assessment in high risk pregnancies. In: Cochrane<br />

Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Database. Volume 2.<br />

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Oxford, UK

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!