21.11.2014 Views

o_1977r8vv9vk1ts2ms0kd8pksa.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a Chapter 2 Physical Principles of Doppler Ultrasonography 13<br />

shadowº affects optimal imaging of structures lying<br />

posterior to the bone. At most tissue interfaces, an<br />

incident beam is echoed in different directions, a process<br />

known as diffuse reflection. In relation to Doppler<br />

ultrasonic reflections, however, an entirely different<br />

phenomenon occurs, known as scattering. This<br />

phenomenon is discussed below.<br />

When an ultrasound beam travels with an oblique<br />

angle of incidence across an interface, the beam path<br />

deviates and the angle of transmission differs from<br />

the angle of incidence (Fig. 2.10). The phenomenon is<br />

similar to refraction of light. Refractive deviation in<br />

the beam path may compromise image quality. For<br />

pulsed Doppler duplex applications, where two-dimensional<br />

gray-scale imaging is used for placing the<br />

Doppler sample volume in deep vascular locations,<br />

refraction may lead to error. However, the propagation<br />

speed of sound does not vary appreciably in<br />

most soft tissues; therefore only minimal refraction<br />

occurs at most tissue interfaces. For example, an ultrasound<br />

beam passing through a muscle-blood interface<br />

at an incident angle of 308 undergoes only a<br />

0847' refractive deviation [2].<br />

Progressive decline in the pressure amplitude and<br />

intensity of a propagating ultrasonic wave is known<br />

as attenuation. Attenuation is caused by many factors,<br />

including absorption, scattering, reflection, and wavefront<br />

divergence. Absorption is the phenomenon<br />

whereby sound energy is converted to heat and is<br />

therefore responsible for thermal bioeffects. Attenuation<br />

is also affected by the transmitting frequency of<br />

a transducer: the higher the frequency, the greater<br />

the attenuation. It limits the use of high-frequency<br />

transducers for Doppler interrogation of deep vascular<br />

structures. These considerations influence the<br />

choice of a transducer for a specific use. Thus for<br />

Doppler examinations of fetal circulation, a 5-MHz<br />

transducer may by less efficient for obtaining adequate<br />

signals than a 2-MHz transducer.<br />

Doppler Effect<br />

The Doppler effect is the phenomenon of observed<br />

changes in the frequency of energy wave transmission<br />

when relative motion occurs between the source of<br />

wave transmission and the observer. The change in<br />

the frequency is known as the Doppler frequency<br />

shift, or simply the Doppler shift:<br />

f d ˆ f t<br />

f r<br />

where f d is the Doppler shift frequency, f t is the<br />

transmitted frequency, and f r is the received frequency.<br />

When the source and the observer move closer,<br />

the wavelength decreases and the frequency increases.<br />

Conversely, when the source and the observer<br />

move apart, the wavelength increases and the frequency<br />

decreases. The Doppler effect is observed irrespective<br />

of whether the source or the observer<br />

moves (Fig. 2.11). The principle is applicable to all<br />

forms of wave propagation. The utility of the Doppler<br />

effect originates from the fact that the shift in frequency<br />

is proportional to the speed of movement between<br />

the source and the receiver and therefore can<br />

be used to assess this speed. The Doppler effect is observed<br />

irrespective of whether the source or the observer<br />

moves.<br />

Incident Beam<br />

Acoustic<br />

Interface<br />

i<br />

r<br />

Reflected Beam<br />

Medium 1<br />

Doppler Ultrasound<br />

For sound transmission, the Doppler shift sound is of<br />

a higher frequency when the source and the receiver<br />

move closer and of a lower frequency when they re-<br />

Meduim 2<br />

t<br />

Transmitted Beam<br />

Fig. 2.10. Reflection, refraction, and transmission of sound.<br />

The beam, in this example, is encountering the acoustic interface<br />

obliquely. A portion of the incident sound is reflected<br />

back, and the rest is transmitted. The angle of reflection<br />

(U r ) equals the angle of incidence (U i ). The transmitted<br />

sound is refracted. The angle of refraction (U t ) depends<br />

on the angle of incidence and the propagation<br />

speeds of sound in medium 1 and medium 2<br />

Fig. 2.11. Graphic depiction of the Doppler shift when a<br />

source of sound transmission moves away or toward a stationary<br />

observer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!