28.11.2014 Views

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Industrial Milling of Sorghum for the 1980s<br />

L. M u n c k * , K. E. Bach Knudsen*, and J. D. A x t e l l * *<br />

If sorghum growing semi-arid countries are to be<br />

self-sufficient in cereals for food during the 1980s,<br />

industrial milling and marketing of sorghum food<br />

products have to be introduced as quickly as<br />

possible. However, endeavors to supply rapidly<br />

growing cities with locally grown sorghum come<br />

up against several severe obstacles.<br />

First, in these countries sorghum is a crop for<br />

the subsistence farmer. There is very little sorghum<br />

on the market, in part because of distorted<br />

governmental food price policies. In many countries,<br />

imported cereals are subsidized and sold at a<br />

lower price than sorghum. In Tanzania, for example,<br />

a white maize product is currently sold at one<br />

third of that of grey whole milled sorghum flour,<br />

even though maize gives a good yield in only 2 out<br />

of 5 years.<br />

Second, the milling process devised for sorghum<br />

has been based on traditional wheat and<br />

maize technologies. Therefore, highly acceptable<br />

white maize and wheat products rapidly gained a<br />

foothold on the urban markets, leaving sorghum<br />

as a low prestige food crop associated with the<br />

backwardness of rural areas. Thus even in countries<br />

where sorghum as a food has age-old<br />

traditions, it is nowadays regarded as a feed crop.<br />

However, in the rural areas, locally developed<br />

techniques such as hand pounding for decortication<br />

are still in use and produce highly acceptable<br />

products. In these areas soghum is preferred to<br />

maize. Unfortunately these local techniques are<br />

now rapidly disappearing, and it is therefore<br />

important to have them documented before it is<br />

too late.<br />

* Carlsberg Research Laboratory, Department of<br />

Biotechnology, Gamle Carlsbergvej 10, DK-2500<br />

Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark.<br />

** Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West<br />

Lafayette, Indiana, USA.<br />

Determination of Needs Through<br />

Studies of Local Practices<br />

Studying local practices is a prerequisite for a<br />

precise evaluation of the acceptability and nutrition<br />

of sorghum, and its role in a mixed food diet.<br />

Such knowledge will contribute to an adequate<br />

background for the future development of industrial<br />

processes. Plate 1 : c displays selected flour<br />

samples which are representative of the current<br />

situation in Tanzania (Eggum et al. 1982) regarding<br />

sorghum milling. It is seen that the hand-pounded,<br />

high-yielding variety 2Kx17/B/1 (comparable with<br />

Lulu D) is by far the most acceptable sample in<br />

terms of whiteness. The machine milled Lulu D<br />

sample, processed in a local village mill devised<br />

for rice, comes next in quality, while the commercial<br />

Lulu D flour is almost as dark as whole milled<br />

sorghum. In Tanzania the latter product is three<br />

times as expensive as maize flour. It goes without<br />

saying that the quantities of sorghum flour sold<br />

under these circumstances are extremely small.<br />

However, the yield-improved, short sorghum<br />

varieties of the Lulu D type (Lulu, 2Kx17/B/1.<br />

2Kx89 in Figure 1) are not ideal for hand pounding<br />

(Eggum et al. 1982). It is seen from the cross<br />

sections of seeds in Figure 1 that they are much<br />

softer than the local Tanzanian hard varieties<br />

(T300, T236, T261, T295, and T275), which are<br />

preferred for hand pounding in the rural areas. If a<br />

fine flour of comparable whiteness is desired,<br />

the modern white varieties yield only about 50%,<br />

while yields from local types range from 73 to<br />

83%. Furthermore it is seen in Table 1 that, using<br />

hand decortication, yields of nutrients (starch 61 %<br />

and protein 44%) are very low in the modern<br />

varieties exemplified by Lulu D. Comparable<br />

figures for the local varieties are 9 2 % starch and<br />

75% protein. It is therefore clear that presently<br />

introduced sorghums are unsuited for hand<br />

pounding. When decorticated to a yield of 80%,<br />

International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 1982. Sorghum in the Eighties: Proceedings of<br />

Symposium on Sorghum, 2-7 Nov 81, Patancheru, A.P.. India. Patancheru, A.P. India: ICRISAT.<br />

the International<br />

565

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!