28.11.2014 Views

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

which is a reasonable figure with the current food<br />

situation in Tanzania, the products will be much<br />

darker than products made from the local hard<br />

varieties, and thereby paving the way for competitive<br />

maize products.<br />

Hand pounding is hard and tedious work. It<br />

takes up to 1 hr to process 2 kg of sorghum. Thus<br />

there is a ready market for small diesel-driven<br />

village mills serving individual farmers who bring<br />

their own batches to the mill. However, in our<br />

experiment (Table 1) we showed that such a<br />

technique is just as dependent on endosperm<br />

hardness as the hand pounding technique. Milling<br />

of Lulu D in a Tanzanian village mill gave a darker<br />

flour (Plate 1 : c) than a hand decorticated flour<br />

from the comparable variety 2Kx17/B/1 and just<br />

as intolerably high losses of starch and protein as<br />

the latter (Table 1).<br />

Nutritional Quality<br />

of Sorghum Products<br />

The content of digestible nutrients in low-tannin<br />

sorghum products is very high compared with<br />

other cereals (Table 2, Eggum et al. 1982). The<br />

true digestibility of protein and energy in decorticated<br />

grain is 100% and 9 6 % respectively. When<br />

sorghum is cooked to make "ugali" porridge,<br />

these values decrease by 8% and 2% respectively.<br />

Although the digestibility of sorghum decreased<br />

through cooking, the values before and<br />

after cooking, are comparable with the best<br />

values for other cereals such as wheat, maize, and<br />

rice. However, the lysine value is very low (Table<br />

2) and decreases by 4 0 % during decortication.<br />

Because lysine is the nutritionally limiting amino<br />

acid in sorghum, the biological value of sorghum<br />

protein is the lowest of all cereals. By supplementing<br />

with lysine-rich foods such as beans<br />

and vegetables, the high potential of digestible<br />

protein and energy in sorghum can be fully<br />

utilized.<br />

Developing a N e w Milling<br />

Technology for Sorghum<br />

The need for a new sorghum milling technology<br />

has been recognized earlier by the Canadian<br />

International Development Research Centre<br />

(IDRC) and FAO. IDRC (Eastman 1980) has<br />

developed a small batch mill for local machine<br />

milling of sorghum using carborundum or silicium<br />

stones. Likewise, FAO has initiated a program for<br />

sorghum milling (Perten et al. 1978) on an<br />

industrial scale. This system also relies on an<br />

abrasive principle.<br />

Mechanisms of hand pounding are very different<br />

from those of abrasive milling. In hand<br />

pounding the pestle causes a mechanical shock<br />

which generates strong interactive forces in<br />

between grains as well as between grains and<br />

equipment. When water is added, large flakes of<br />

hull material are formed. On the other hand, in<br />

abrasive milling the polishing effect is mainly<br />

obtained between the grinding stones and the<br />

seeds and as action of seeds against seeds,<br />

thereby producing fine bran particles. Abrasive<br />

milling through kernel breakage causes losses of<br />

endosperm in the bran fraction. However, hand<br />

pounding initially produces coarse endosperm<br />

particles that dwindle during the successive cycles<br />

of decortication. At the Carlsberg Research<br />

Laboratory we have developed an industrial decortication<br />

process aimed at avoiding the disadvantages<br />

of abrasive milling and incorporating the<br />

advantages of the age-old hand pounding principle<br />

(Munck et al. 1982).<br />

In the new decortication machine (Fig. 2) (UMS<br />

DVA, United Milling Systems A/S, DK-2500<br />

Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark) the sorghum ker-<br />

Table 2.<br />

Nutritional quality in rat tests of the improved variety 2Kx17/B/1 (comparable with Lulu D) and the<br />

hand decorticated grain at well as the cooked product ugali (Eggum et al. 1982).<br />

True digestibility<br />

protein<br />

Digestible<br />

energy<br />

Biological<br />

value of protein<br />

Lysine<br />

g/16gN<br />

Whole grain<br />

Hand decorticated grain<br />

Ugali<br />

95<br />

100<br />

92<br />

90 56<br />

96 47<br />

94 49<br />

2.0<br />

1.2<br />

1.2<br />

567

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!