RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
which is a reasonable figure with the current food<br />
situation in Tanzania, the products will be much<br />
darker than products made from the local hard<br />
varieties, and thereby paving the way for competitive<br />
maize products.<br />
Hand pounding is hard and tedious work. It<br />
takes up to 1 hr to process 2 kg of sorghum. Thus<br />
there is a ready market for small diesel-driven<br />
village mills serving individual farmers who bring<br />
their own batches to the mill. However, in our<br />
experiment (Table 1) we showed that such a<br />
technique is just as dependent on endosperm<br />
hardness as the hand pounding technique. Milling<br />
of Lulu D in a Tanzanian village mill gave a darker<br />
flour (Plate 1 : c) than a hand decorticated flour<br />
from the comparable variety 2Kx17/B/1 and just<br />
as intolerably high losses of starch and protein as<br />
the latter (Table 1).<br />
Nutritional Quality<br />
of Sorghum Products<br />
The content of digestible nutrients in low-tannin<br />
sorghum products is very high compared with<br />
other cereals (Table 2, Eggum et al. 1982). The<br />
true digestibility of protein and energy in decorticated<br />
grain is 100% and 9 6 % respectively. When<br />
sorghum is cooked to make "ugali" porridge,<br />
these values decrease by 8% and 2% respectively.<br />
Although the digestibility of sorghum decreased<br />
through cooking, the values before and<br />
after cooking, are comparable with the best<br />
values for other cereals such as wheat, maize, and<br />
rice. However, the lysine value is very low (Table<br />
2) and decreases by 4 0 % during decortication.<br />
Because lysine is the nutritionally limiting amino<br />
acid in sorghum, the biological value of sorghum<br />
protein is the lowest of all cereals. By supplementing<br />
with lysine-rich foods such as beans<br />
and vegetables, the high potential of digestible<br />
protein and energy in sorghum can be fully<br />
utilized.<br />
Developing a N e w Milling<br />
Technology for Sorghum<br />
The need for a new sorghum milling technology<br />
has been recognized earlier by the Canadian<br />
International Development Research Centre<br />
(IDRC) and FAO. IDRC (Eastman 1980) has<br />
developed a small batch mill for local machine<br />
milling of sorghum using carborundum or silicium<br />
stones. Likewise, FAO has initiated a program for<br />
sorghum milling (Perten et al. 1978) on an<br />
industrial scale. This system also relies on an<br />
abrasive principle.<br />
Mechanisms of hand pounding are very different<br />
from those of abrasive milling. In hand<br />
pounding the pestle causes a mechanical shock<br />
which generates strong interactive forces in<br />
between grains as well as between grains and<br />
equipment. When water is added, large flakes of<br />
hull material are formed. On the other hand, in<br />
abrasive milling the polishing effect is mainly<br />
obtained between the grinding stones and the<br />
seeds and as action of seeds against seeds,<br />
thereby producing fine bran particles. Abrasive<br />
milling through kernel breakage causes losses of<br />
endosperm in the bran fraction. However, hand<br />
pounding initially produces coarse endosperm<br />
particles that dwindle during the successive cycles<br />
of decortication. At the Carlsberg Research<br />
Laboratory we have developed an industrial decortication<br />
process aimed at avoiding the disadvantages<br />
of abrasive milling and incorporating the<br />
advantages of the age-old hand pounding principle<br />
(Munck et al. 1982).<br />
In the new decortication machine (Fig. 2) (UMS<br />
DVA, United Milling Systems A/S, DK-2500<br />
Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark) the sorghum ker-<br />
Table 2.<br />
Nutritional quality in rat tests of the improved variety 2Kx17/B/1 (comparable with Lulu D) and the<br />
hand decorticated grain at well as the cooked product ugali (Eggum et al. 1982).<br />
True digestibility<br />
protein<br />
Digestible<br />
energy<br />
Biological<br />
value of protein<br />
Lysine<br />
g/16gN<br />
Whole grain<br />
Hand decorticated grain<br />
Ugali<br />
95<br />
100<br />
92<br />
90 56<br />
96 47<br />
94 49<br />
2.0<br />
1.2<br />
1.2<br />
567