RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
emphasized yield-increasing technologies. 25 As a<br />
result, the most successful introduction of oxen<br />
has occurred where farmers have most widely<br />
adopted the successful yield-increasing technologies<br />
for export cash crops (e.g., cotton in Mali Sud<br />
and groundnuts in Sine Saloum in Senegal).<br />
However, this situation does not negate the<br />
assertion that given the availability of relevant<br />
labor-saving technologies and relevant support<br />
systems permitting their adoption, there would be<br />
a greater response in terms of increasing the<br />
areas cultivated. For example, in Thailand where<br />
animal traction is traditionally part of the farming<br />
system, much of the increase in agricultural<br />
incomes in the last 20 years has come from area<br />
expansion although yields of most crops have<br />
declined as more marginal land has been brought<br />
into cultivation. In the northeastern part of the<br />
country cassava, being a less labor-intensive crop<br />
than rice and kenaf, has expanded rapidly.<br />
Possibly, under such circumstances, breeders<br />
have a less clear role in developing improved<br />
technologies than agronomists and other<br />
scientists." Work emphasizing land-intensive development/conservation,<br />
irrigation," etc., is not<br />
likely to be adopted by farming families, but<br />
agronomists in conjunction with other scientists<br />
still have a significant role to play in developing<br />
practices that improve the productivity of labor<br />
such as intercropping and other practices which<br />
can help alleviate the weeding bottleneck period,<br />
improved planting systems, minimum tillage, reducing<br />
labor-intensive activities such as bird and<br />
monkey scaring, etc. However, as will be discussed<br />
later, the large distances resulting from high<br />
land/resident ratios make it likely that market<br />
systems, and hence access to support systems,<br />
might not be so well developed as in more<br />
densely populated areas. Consequently, under<br />
25. In many cases, the presence of tree stumps in fields<br />
has encouraged animal traction being linked with<br />
land intensification, since the destumping operation<br />
involves substantial investment.<br />
26. Obviously, if breeders were to provide varieties<br />
attuned to such a resource base, stability of yield,<br />
resistance to diseases and pests and ability to<br />
withstand competition from weeds would be more<br />
important criteria than responsiveness to additions<br />
of nitrogen fertilizer.<br />
27. This does not however negate the possible use of<br />
irrigation in the dry season when labor is underemployed.<br />
such circumstances improvements that require<br />
low dependence on the support systems are likely<br />
to be easier for farmers to adopt. However, in<br />
suggesting this, it is recognized that it makes it<br />
more difficult for agricultural scientists to develop<br />
improvements.<br />
Variations in Land/Labor Ratios<br />
Among Farmers in the Same Region<br />
We have earlier suggested that inter-regional<br />
variations in land/labor ratios tend to be large. In<br />
the SAT they tend to be larger than intra-regional<br />
differences. A study undertaken by Ryan and<br />
Rathore (1978) in Indian villages showed that<br />
factor "ownership" ratios (i.e., ratio of "owned"<br />
land 28 to family labor) differ quite widely on large<br />
and small farms. However, factor use ratios differ<br />
much less among the groups although there is a<br />
large variation within the groups. The reason for<br />
the narrowing of the ratio is that factors such as<br />
land and labor are exchanged in rental markets.<br />
Ryan and Rathore (1978) suggest that current<br />
policies aimed at improving the access of operators<br />
of small farms to institutional credit markets<br />
will result in even more similar factor use ratios<br />
between small and large farms. In another study<br />
in the same villages, Binswanger (1978) found<br />
that both small and large farmers are moderately<br />
risk averse. Therefore, on the basis of both factor<br />
use ratios and risk aversion grounds, it was<br />
concluded that little could be gained from developing<br />
different improved technologies for small<br />
and large farmers. Rather, emphasis has to be<br />
placed on relatively profitable and stable technologies<br />
for all farmers and improved accessibility of<br />
small farmers to input support systems (i.e..<br />
modern inputs, credit, and extension).<br />
There are no directly comparable studies to<br />
ascertain whether the same conclusions would<br />
apply in countries in Africa. We would hypothesize<br />
however that in areas of high land/labor ratios<br />
where the amount of land cultivated is largely a<br />
function of the size of the family labor force, factor<br />
use ratios are not likely to differ significantly. In<br />
areas of lower land/labor ratios, sophisticated<br />
exchange/mobilization mechanisms for exchanging<br />
factors appear to give way to rental markets.<br />
28. "Owned" is placed in inverted commas since<br />
generally in African countries individuals have usufructuary<br />
rights to land but do not actually own the<br />
land itself.<br />
639