RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tates at least a partial duplication of the research<br />
effort in order for the policy maker to have the<br />
right information. 12<br />
As in any research, paring down the problem to<br />
manageable proportions is essential. Research of<br />
the 1970s concentrated on specific marketing<br />
regions, resulting in considerable information<br />
about specific regions, to the exclusion of an<br />
understanding of the countrywide marketing system—the<br />
links and how they fit together.<br />
Regional diversity is an important dimension of<br />
the problem of food distribution. Regional differences<br />
in trader organization and behavior, market<br />
channels, and peasant output and commercialization<br />
patterns are significant. In the initial phase of<br />
research for the 1980s, basic information must be<br />
gathered from all regions of the country so that<br />
the areas selected for the intensive part of the<br />
research can be chosen to represent the range of<br />
marketing/production situations that exist. Specifically,<br />
information is needed on the entire hierarchy<br />
from the producer through the urban traders<br />
and back out to the consumer, both urban and<br />
rural.<br />
For the most intensive part of this type of<br />
research, data must be gathered at several<br />
different levels: the market, individual traders, and<br />
peasants. Market data should include frequent<br />
and regular information about prices and quantities.<br />
Information about market structure is particularly<br />
important: trader organizations, price setting<br />
techniques, market control and differentiation<br />
practices. For individual traders, in addition to the<br />
prices and quantities of sales and purchases, data<br />
on operating procedures, methods of reducing<br />
costs, evaluating and reacting to risks and making<br />
decisions are essential for understanding why the<br />
market takes on its overall characteristics. At the<br />
most microeconomic level, data on the individual<br />
producer/consumer's behavior with respect to<br />
sales, purchases, and consumption complete the<br />
12. This is not to be misconstrued as meaning that<br />
research for its own sake is useless. It is an<br />
efficiency issue. In a region where funds and<br />
personnel are limited, the best use of such resources<br />
is to do research that addresses most<br />
directly and completely the concerted priorities of<br />
the population. Also, a considerable amount of<br />
narrower-in-scope research on aspects of the grain<br />
marketing system in the region has already been<br />
conducted.<br />
picture. This can be gathered through a combination<br />
of formal questionnaires and informal discussions.<br />
We also suggest that in the process of doing<br />
basic production research, certain marketing information<br />
should be collected as part of the interviewer's<br />
and researcher's regular inquiries. Because<br />
so much production research is conducted<br />
on a yearly basis, the production researcher has<br />
the possibility of collecting an enormous amount<br />
of data easily, for example, output quantities,<br />
relative amounts of purchases and sales throughout<br />
the agricultural cycle, trading alternatives, road<br />
conditions and transportation availability, input<br />
sources, credit availability, grain storage facilities<br />
and conditions, and market access. These few<br />
pieces of information would not be a burden for<br />
the production researcher and would be extremely<br />
useful for the marketing researcher, especially<br />
in the early stages of his research.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The purpose of this paper has been to put the<br />
findings of research on grain marketing in the<br />
WASAT into a perspective that allows recommendations<br />
for the direction of future research. Five<br />
major conclusions have been drawn.<br />
1. The diversity of marketing channels, infrastructure,<br />
geographic and climatic characteristics<br />
of each country militates against a<br />
countrywide approach. In the past, studies<br />
of one or two regions inside a country have<br />
erroneously drawn national conclusions,<br />
which have led to policies that are ill-adapted<br />
to the perceived problems. Future studies<br />
should take a systems approach, identifying<br />
the major forces in the marketing system<br />
and investigating each, both on their own<br />
and for their part in the entire food system.<br />
Several levels of investigation are implied:<br />
geographical differences in produced and<br />
marketed quantities and intertemporal patterns<br />
of purchases and sales; roads and<br />
transportation networks; storage facilities;<br />
economic groups and trader organizations;<br />
and government participation in production<br />
and marketing activities. The geographical<br />
areas have systems of their own that are<br />
linked to the systems in neighboring regions<br />
and to the national systems. Once the<br />
overall picture is understood, more intensive<br />
655