28.11.2014 Views

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tates at least a partial duplication of the research<br />

effort in order for the policy maker to have the<br />

right information. 12<br />

As in any research, paring down the problem to<br />

manageable proportions is essential. Research of<br />

the 1970s concentrated on specific marketing<br />

regions, resulting in considerable information<br />

about specific regions, to the exclusion of an<br />

understanding of the countrywide marketing system—the<br />

links and how they fit together.<br />

Regional diversity is an important dimension of<br />

the problem of food distribution. Regional differences<br />

in trader organization and behavior, market<br />

channels, and peasant output and commercialization<br />

patterns are significant. In the initial phase of<br />

research for the 1980s, basic information must be<br />

gathered from all regions of the country so that<br />

the areas selected for the intensive part of the<br />

research can be chosen to represent the range of<br />

marketing/production situations that exist. Specifically,<br />

information is needed on the entire hierarchy<br />

from the producer through the urban traders<br />

and back out to the consumer, both urban and<br />

rural.<br />

For the most intensive part of this type of<br />

research, data must be gathered at several<br />

different levels: the market, individual traders, and<br />

peasants. Market data should include frequent<br />

and regular information about prices and quantities.<br />

Information about market structure is particularly<br />

important: trader organizations, price setting<br />

techniques, market control and differentiation<br />

practices. For individual traders, in addition to the<br />

prices and quantities of sales and purchases, data<br />

on operating procedures, methods of reducing<br />

costs, evaluating and reacting to risks and making<br />

decisions are essential for understanding why the<br />

market takes on its overall characteristics. At the<br />

most microeconomic level, data on the individual<br />

producer/consumer's behavior with respect to<br />

sales, purchases, and consumption complete the<br />

12. This is not to be misconstrued as meaning that<br />

research for its own sake is useless. It is an<br />

efficiency issue. In a region where funds and<br />

personnel are limited, the best use of such resources<br />

is to do research that addresses most<br />

directly and completely the concerted priorities of<br />

the population. Also, a considerable amount of<br />

narrower-in-scope research on aspects of the grain<br />

marketing system in the region has already been<br />

conducted.<br />

picture. This can be gathered through a combination<br />

of formal questionnaires and informal discussions.<br />

We also suggest that in the process of doing<br />

basic production research, certain marketing information<br />

should be collected as part of the interviewer's<br />

and researcher's regular inquiries. Because<br />

so much production research is conducted<br />

on a yearly basis, the production researcher has<br />

the possibility of collecting an enormous amount<br />

of data easily, for example, output quantities,<br />

relative amounts of purchases and sales throughout<br />

the agricultural cycle, trading alternatives, road<br />

conditions and transportation availability, input<br />

sources, credit availability, grain storage facilities<br />

and conditions, and market access. These few<br />

pieces of information would not be a burden for<br />

the production researcher and would be extremely<br />

useful for the marketing researcher, especially<br />

in the early stages of his research.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The purpose of this paper has been to put the<br />

findings of research on grain marketing in the<br />

WASAT into a perspective that allows recommendations<br />

for the direction of future research. Five<br />

major conclusions have been drawn.<br />

1. The diversity of marketing channels, infrastructure,<br />

geographic and climatic characteristics<br />

of each country militates against a<br />

countrywide approach. In the past, studies<br />

of one or two regions inside a country have<br />

erroneously drawn national conclusions,<br />

which have led to policies that are ill-adapted<br />

to the perceived problems. Future studies<br />

should take a systems approach, identifying<br />

the major forces in the marketing system<br />

and investigating each, both on their own<br />

and for their part in the entire food system.<br />

Several levels of investigation are implied:<br />

geographical differences in produced and<br />

marketed quantities and intertemporal patterns<br />

of purchases and sales; roads and<br />

transportation networks; storage facilities;<br />

economic groups and trader organizations;<br />

and government participation in production<br />

and marketing activities. The geographical<br />

areas have systems of their own that are<br />

linked to the systems in neighboring regions<br />

and to the national systems. Once the<br />

overall picture is understood, more intensive<br />

655

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!