28.11.2014 Views

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

most developing countries, farmers are forced to<br />

sell their crops at the time of harvest because<br />

they lack the facilities for drying and storage.<br />

Sorghum and millet in head are usually dried on<br />

platforms of various sizes supported by a wooden<br />

framework raised 3 - 4 feet off the ground, with<br />

heads piled to various depths. Rough rice and<br />

other threshed crops are spread on the mat for<br />

sun drying. The drying methods used on the farm<br />

in developing countries are, in general, unsound<br />

except for economic consideration. Considerable<br />

quantities of grains can be saved and preserved if<br />

a simple, economic drying method is available<br />

when sun drying cannot be accomplished.<br />

The main causes of grain damage and losses<br />

are the improper and inadequate grain handling,<br />

drying, and storage methods employed on the<br />

farms. Reduction of losses through improved<br />

facilities has been used as justification for the new<br />

facilities. However, new facilities in themselves<br />

will not prevent losses. An equally important<br />

aspect of safe grain storage is to employ good<br />

management practices. These include examining<br />

grains periodically for signs of heating, insects,<br />

mold, and rodents; good housekeeping and sanitation<br />

in and around the premises; cleaning of grain;<br />

maintaining uniform moisture of grain; and chemical<br />

pest control measures. However, such<br />

practices are not well followed on farms because<br />

of a lack of understanding of grain storage<br />

fundamentals by farmers. On very rare occasions,<br />

chemical pest control measures are used. Other<br />

pest control measures used occasionally by farmers<br />

include ashes, smoke from cooking fires, rat<br />

guards made of tin cans, and cats for rodent<br />

control. In spite of the fact that grains are stored<br />

under adverse conditions for proper grain preservation,<br />

individual farmers in developing countries<br />

are taking reasonably good care of grain during<br />

storage because they need this food supply until<br />

the next harvest.<br />

In addition to the problems mentioned above,<br />

the first links in the movement of grain off the<br />

farm into major marketing channels, "first collection<br />

points", are often missing in developing<br />

countries. The existence of poor postharvest grain<br />

facilities at the farm level is perhaps not the main<br />

drawback, but rather the lack of development of a<br />

marketing system, i.e., roads, transport facilities<br />

grading systems, market news, etc. Other problems<br />

that exist in developing countries are the<br />

lack of technical personnel familiar with postharvest<br />

grain technology, and the very sporadic<br />

existence of government organizations or other<br />

institutions responsible for the development of<br />

improved on-farm postharvest systems.<br />

With a very few exceptions, there exist virtually<br />

no formal programs or concerted efforts by<br />

governments of the developing countries for<br />

developing improved postharvest grain systems.<br />

However, it is encouraging to note the recent<br />

establishment of the Southeast Asia Cooperative<br />

Postharvest Research and Development Program<br />

(SEARCA) by the five ASEAN countries. This<br />

program is administered by high level administrators<br />

from each of the five countries and is<br />

responsible for formulating improved postharvest<br />

grain systems for Southeast Asia. The SEARCA<br />

technical team is supported by various donor<br />

agencies (i.e., IDRC, USAID, RTI, CSIRO. etc.).<br />

In addition, there exists the Group for Assistance<br />

on Systems relating to Grain After Harvest<br />

(GASGA). GASGA members are:<br />

The Food and Agriculture Organization, UN<br />

(FAO).<br />

L' Institute de Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales,<br />

France (I<strong>RA</strong>T).<br />

The International Development Research Centre,<br />

Canada (IDRC).<br />

The Food and Feed Grain Institute, Kansas<br />

State University, USA (FFGI).<br />

The Tropical Products Institute, England (TPI).<br />

International Institute of Tropical Agriculture,<br />

Nigeria (IITA).<br />

Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit,<br />

Germany (GTZ).<br />

Koninklijk Institute voor de Tropen, Netherlands<br />

(RTI).<br />

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research<br />

Organization, Australia (CSIRO).<br />

Each GASGA member institution is actively<br />

involved in technical training and conferences, and<br />

appropriate technology development for postharvest<br />

grain systems in developing countries. Under<br />

a cooperative agreement between the Food and<br />

Feed Grain Institute, FFGI, Kansas State University,<br />

and USAID/Washington, FFGI has been providing<br />

technical assistance on grain storage,<br />

drying, processing, marketing, and agri-business<br />

development for many developing countries.<br />

Suggestions and<br />

Recommendations<br />

Interest and concern for these postharvest prob-<br />

530

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!