RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Session 8 Socioeconomic Considerations<br />
J. 6. Ryan* Discussant—1<br />
Rather than r e v i e w the five papers I w a s asked to<br />
discuss<br />
in t h e socioeconomic session of the<br />
" S o r g h u m in t h e Eighties" s y m p o s i u m , I propose<br />
to build upon s o m e of their t h e m e s and add a f e w<br />
of my o w n . I will take a s o m e w h a t broader v i e w of<br />
t h e constraints to s o r g h u m production, its marketing,<br />
and t h e conduct of research than the authors<br />
of t h e papers. This is not m e a n t to u n d e r m i n e<br />
their useful contributions but to c o m p l e m e n t<br />
t h e m .<br />
The paper includes a discussion of past and<br />
future trends in w o r l d s o r g h u m production, c o n <br />
s u m p t i o n and d e m a n d w h i c h highlights t h e particular<br />
p r o b l e m s w h i c h the countries of sub-Sahara<br />
Africa m a y face in the 1980s. The importance of<br />
d o c u m e n t i n g and understanding the adoption of<br />
" m a t u r e " s o r g h u m innovations in the context of<br />
ex ante design of subsequent n e w technologies is<br />
t h e n addressed. The role of markets, infrastructure,<br />
delivery s y s t e m s , and related policy initiatives<br />
are considered as they affect s o r g h u m<br />
production and adoption. Criteria for d e t e rmining<br />
t h e allocation of research resources a m o n g s t t h e<br />
various s o r g h u m producing regions of t h e SAT are<br />
included. S o m e discussion of possible f u t u r e<br />
priorities in s o r g h u m breeding f o l l o w s w i t h t h e<br />
p e n u l t i m a t e section d e v o t e d to the potential<br />
contribution that a farming s y s t e m s approach to<br />
s o r g h u m research could m a k e in t h e eighties. A<br />
concluding s t a t e m e n t t h e n e m e r g e s .<br />
Sorghum Trends<br />
and their Implications<br />
T h e w o r l d area o f s o r g h u m n o w e x c e e d s 5 0<br />
million hectares (Table 1). It has been g r o w i n g<br />
since 1964 at t h e rate of 0.37 million hectares<br />
* Leader. E c o n o m i c s P r o g r a m , ICRISAT.<br />
annually. 1 W h e n c o m b i n e d w i t h t h e s t e a d y<br />
g r o w t h in yields of 25 k g / h a per year over t h e<br />
s a m e period (2.2%), the area expansion has led to<br />
an annual trend g r o w t h in s o r g h u m production of<br />
1.66 million tonnes. 2 This represents a c o m p o u n d<br />
annual g r o w t h rate of production of 2 . 9 0 % . We<br />
have e s t i m a t e d f r o m a study by t h e W o r l d Bank<br />
(1977) that up to 1985 the annual rate of g r o w t h in<br />
d e m a n d for coarse grains in developing countries<br />
will be 3 . 6 0 % . This c o m p a r e s w i t h t h e e s t i m a t e of<br />
Aziz (1976) for the less developed market e c o n o <br />
mies of 3 . 5 5 % f r o m 1980 to 1990 and 3 . 5 7 %<br />
f r o m 1980 to 2000. FAO (1971) e s t i m a t e s annual<br />
c o m p o u n d g r o w t h rates of d e m a n d for coarse<br />
cereals f r o m 1980 to 1985 of 2 . 6 9 % for developing<br />
market economies. 3 These figures suggest<br />
that d e m a n d pressures for s o r g h u m m a y build in<br />
the 80s and exceed historical g r o w t h rates in<br />
w o r l d production.<br />
S o r g h u m production has g r o w n at an annual<br />
rate of 3 . 8 0 % in the developing countries of t h e<br />
semi-arid tropics (SAT) f r o m 1964 to 1978. This is<br />
a m u c h better record than in t h e d e v e l o p e d<br />
1 . D e r i v e d f r o m linear t r e n d lines f i t t e d t o F A O data f r o m<br />
1 9 6 4 to 1978. T h e e q u a t i o n is: Area ('000 ha) =<br />
4 5 2 3 0 + 370t, w h e r e t = t i m e in years a n d t h e f i g u r e<br />
(3.4)<br />
i n p a r e n t h e s e s i s t h e e s t i m a t e d t-value o f t h e c o e f f i <br />
c i e n t on t i m e . T h e year 1 9 6 4 implies t = 1. T h e R 2 w a s<br />
0 . 4 8 .<br />
2. T h e respective linear t r e n d e q u a t i o n s a r e : Yield<br />
(kg/ha) = 1008 + 2 5 t w i t h R 2 of 0 . 7 4 ; a n d P r o d u c t i o n<br />
(6.0)<br />
('000 m e t r i c tons) = 4 5 0 5 1 + 1 6 5 7 t w i t h R 2 of 0 . 9 2 .<br />
(12.1)<br />
3 . Additional d e m a n d not a c c o u n t e d f o r i n t h e a b o v e<br />
projections m a y also derive f r o m e x p a n d e d u s e o f<br />
s o r g h u m as a s o u r c e of f e e d s t o c k f o r p r o d u c t i o n of<br />
alcohol to replace oil. This is already o c c u r r i n g in t h e<br />
U.S. a n d Brazil (Schaffert a n d G o u r l e y 1982).<br />
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 1982. Sorghum in the Eighties: Proceedings of the International<br />
Symposium on Sorghum, 2 - 7 Nov 8 1 . Patancheru, A.P., India. Patancheru, A.P. India: ICRISAT.<br />
6 9 9