RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
why a substantial percentage of farming families<br />
in the SAT regions supplement their income from<br />
agriculture through working in other occupations<br />
within or outside their home areas, particularly in<br />
the dry season. 12 The severity and nature of labor<br />
bottlenecks during the rainy season is determined<br />
in part by the length of growing season (the<br />
shorter it is the more peaked is labor activity), the<br />
type of technology being used and the power<br />
source (Norman et al. 1981). 13<br />
This pronounced peaking of agricultural activities<br />
in rainfed agriculture can complicate decisions<br />
concerning research priorities. Whether or not<br />
they should receive serious attention in research<br />
design will depend on the local situation particularly<br />
with respect to the land/labor ratios.<br />
An example illustrating this pertains to one of<br />
the very common labor bottlenecks in the SAT<br />
regions involving weeding crops. Binswanger and<br />
Shetty (1977) have looked at the potential for<br />
herbicides solving this problem in India. An<br />
investigation of current practices revealed important<br />
information required in evaluating the potential<br />
value of herbicides.' 4 They found farming<br />
families, sensitive to the adverse impact of<br />
weeds, rationally adjusted their weeding operations<br />
according both to the severity of the<br />
problem and to the potential payoff from weeding.<br />
In general, there were high levels of interrow<br />
cultivation with animal draft power and intrarow<br />
cultivation with hand labor. Although labor requirements<br />
for weeding operations were high, wage<br />
rates are low at such times. Consequently, even<br />
when all labor was costed at the market rate,<br />
budget studies on the cost effectiveness of<br />
herbicides indicated they were not competitive<br />
12. Such work patterns, that on a monthly basis show a<br />
negative correlation with agricultural activities on<br />
family farms, are in contrast to the farm laboring<br />
activities of the rural landless and land poor families<br />
in India where the level of such work is positively<br />
correlated with the agricultural cycle.<br />
13. Labor bottlenecks can also be a function of the<br />
aggregation period used for analyzing the data (e.g..<br />
week or month). This can on occasion create<br />
misleading impressions about the severity of the<br />
labor bottlenecks. Where timing is a critical issue<br />
(e.g., in the weeding operation) the aggregation<br />
period should be shorter.<br />
14. Value was estimated by looking at cost effectiveness<br />
assuming that there were no yield effects of<br />
different methods.<br />
with current practices. Also much of the labor<br />
provided for the weeding operation is contributed<br />
by the most disadvantaged labor group in the<br />
Indian economy, namely female agricultural laborers<br />
from poorer families. Thus the societal costs<br />
of introducing herbicides, in terms of displacing<br />
labor, would be potentially very high. Not surprisingly<br />
these findings have led ICRISAT to deemphasize<br />
chemical weed control in the Indian part<br />
of its research program (Binswanger and Ryan<br />
1980).<br />
The conclusion could well be different in areas<br />
of lower population density (i.e., higher land/<br />
resident ratios and no landless laboring class).<br />
However, working with farmers in northern Nigeria,<br />
where such conditions do in fact prevail,<br />
Ogungbile (1980) still derived negative conclusions<br />
concerning herbicides. Incorporating his<br />
results into a dynamic linear programming model<br />
he found that the discounted net incomes over a 5<br />
year period were highest for farming families<br />
using oxen, in the middle for those using hand<br />
weeding only, and lowest for those using herbicides.<br />
Although there were obviously problems<br />
with the herbicide technology packages and the<br />
farmers' application of them, 15 some legitimate<br />
doubts can be raised about their always being<br />
relevant even in areas where land/resident ratios<br />
are higher. It is likely, for example, that herbicides<br />
will only be profitable when combined with<br />
yield-increasing technologies that usually involve<br />
raising plant population densities and that, without<br />
herbicides, require more intensive weeding.' 6 This<br />
in fact is currently occurring to a small extent in<br />
Mali Sud where yield-increasing cotton technology<br />
has been so widely adopted. An additional<br />
problem of using herbicides is finding those that<br />
are suitable for use in crop mixtures so characteristic<br />
of traditional systems of agriculture. A further<br />
15. For example, the herbicides applied prior to planting<br />
in the form of herbilizer were not always very<br />
effective. In addition farmers often weeded before it<br />
was really necessary, further decreasing the effectiveness<br />
of the herbicides in reducing labor inputs.<br />
16. For example, in India Binswanger and Shetty (1977)<br />
found in some villages well over 5 0 % of the<br />
sorghum fields were interrow cultivated with animal<br />
draft three or more times while about 3 0 % of the<br />
fields were hand weeded t w o or more times. In<br />
contrast in northern Nigeria, many of the sorghum<br />
fields are not weeded more than two times while<br />
often no animal draft power is used.<br />
636