28.11.2014 Views

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00048.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

why a substantial percentage of farming families<br />

in the SAT regions supplement their income from<br />

agriculture through working in other occupations<br />

within or outside their home areas, particularly in<br />

the dry season. 12 The severity and nature of labor<br />

bottlenecks during the rainy season is determined<br />

in part by the length of growing season (the<br />

shorter it is the more peaked is labor activity), the<br />

type of technology being used and the power<br />

source (Norman et al. 1981). 13<br />

This pronounced peaking of agricultural activities<br />

in rainfed agriculture can complicate decisions<br />

concerning research priorities. Whether or not<br />

they should receive serious attention in research<br />

design will depend on the local situation particularly<br />

with respect to the land/labor ratios.<br />

An example illustrating this pertains to one of<br />

the very common labor bottlenecks in the SAT<br />

regions involving weeding crops. Binswanger and<br />

Shetty (1977) have looked at the potential for<br />

herbicides solving this problem in India. An<br />

investigation of current practices revealed important<br />

information required in evaluating the potential<br />

value of herbicides.' 4 They found farming<br />

families, sensitive to the adverse impact of<br />

weeds, rationally adjusted their weeding operations<br />

according both to the severity of the<br />

problem and to the potential payoff from weeding.<br />

In general, there were high levels of interrow<br />

cultivation with animal draft power and intrarow<br />

cultivation with hand labor. Although labor requirements<br />

for weeding operations were high, wage<br />

rates are low at such times. Consequently, even<br />

when all labor was costed at the market rate,<br />

budget studies on the cost effectiveness of<br />

herbicides indicated they were not competitive<br />

12. Such work patterns, that on a monthly basis show a<br />

negative correlation with agricultural activities on<br />

family farms, are in contrast to the farm laboring<br />

activities of the rural landless and land poor families<br />

in India where the level of such work is positively<br />

correlated with the agricultural cycle.<br />

13. Labor bottlenecks can also be a function of the<br />

aggregation period used for analyzing the data (e.g..<br />

week or month). This can on occasion create<br />

misleading impressions about the severity of the<br />

labor bottlenecks. Where timing is a critical issue<br />

(e.g., in the weeding operation) the aggregation<br />

period should be shorter.<br />

14. Value was estimated by looking at cost effectiveness<br />

assuming that there were no yield effects of<br />

different methods.<br />

with current practices. Also much of the labor<br />

provided for the weeding operation is contributed<br />

by the most disadvantaged labor group in the<br />

Indian economy, namely female agricultural laborers<br />

from poorer families. Thus the societal costs<br />

of introducing herbicides, in terms of displacing<br />

labor, would be potentially very high. Not surprisingly<br />

these findings have led ICRISAT to deemphasize<br />

chemical weed control in the Indian part<br />

of its research program (Binswanger and Ryan<br />

1980).<br />

The conclusion could well be different in areas<br />

of lower population density (i.e., higher land/<br />

resident ratios and no landless laboring class).<br />

However, working with farmers in northern Nigeria,<br />

where such conditions do in fact prevail,<br />

Ogungbile (1980) still derived negative conclusions<br />

concerning herbicides. Incorporating his<br />

results into a dynamic linear programming model<br />

he found that the discounted net incomes over a 5<br />

year period were highest for farming families<br />

using oxen, in the middle for those using hand<br />

weeding only, and lowest for those using herbicides.<br />

Although there were obviously problems<br />

with the herbicide technology packages and the<br />

farmers' application of them, 15 some legitimate<br />

doubts can be raised about their always being<br />

relevant even in areas where land/resident ratios<br />

are higher. It is likely, for example, that herbicides<br />

will only be profitable when combined with<br />

yield-increasing technologies that usually involve<br />

raising plant population densities and that, without<br />

herbicides, require more intensive weeding.' 6 This<br />

in fact is currently occurring to a small extent in<br />

Mali Sud where yield-increasing cotton technology<br />

has been so widely adopted. An additional<br />

problem of using herbicides is finding those that<br />

are suitable for use in crop mixtures so characteristic<br />

of traditional systems of agriculture. A further<br />

15. For example, the herbicides applied prior to planting<br />

in the form of herbilizer were not always very<br />

effective. In addition farmers often weeded before it<br />

was really necessary, further decreasing the effectiveness<br />

of the herbicides in reducing labor inputs.<br />

16. For example, in India Binswanger and Shetty (1977)<br />

found in some villages well over 5 0 % of the<br />

sorghum fields were interrow cultivated with animal<br />

draft three or more times while about 3 0 % of the<br />

fields were hand weeded t w o or more times. In<br />

contrast in northern Nigeria, many of the sorghum<br />

fields are not weeded more than two times while<br />

often no animal draft power is used.<br />

636

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!