23.12.2014 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

saerTaSoriso samarTlis Jurnali, #1, 2008 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, N1, 2008<br />

in ensuring the physical and mental wellbeing<br />

of children. Government agencies should give<br />

high priority to programmes for young persons<br />

and provide sufficient resources for the effective<br />

delivery of services, facilities and staff for<br />

adequate medical and mental health care,<br />

nutrition, housing and other relevant services,<br />

including drug and alcohol abuse prevention<br />

and treatment, ensuring that such resources<br />

reach and actually benefit young persons.<br />

The Beijing Rules clearly stresses the importance<br />

of the rehabilitation/reintegration process.<br />

Furthermore, the promotion of juvenile<br />

welfare is viewed as only one of the objectives<br />

of comprehensive social policy for juveniles<br />

that shall, play a crucial role also in prevention<br />

of juvenile delinquency.<br />

The aim of the paper is to represent the<br />

international legislation for the protection of<br />

the children that deprived their liberty<br />

Fundamental principles underlying<br />

any approach to issues of juvenile justice<br />

include: – The minimum age for criminal responsibility<br />

should be the age of 15 or as close<br />

as possible to that age; – presumption of innocence;<br />

– due process guarantees; – immediate<br />

notification of parents or guardians and<br />

their right to be present upon the apprehension<br />

of a juvenile; – avoiding detention before<br />

trial if possible and ensuring that any pre-trial<br />

detention is for the shortest possible period<br />

and only as the last resort; – right to facilities<br />

and services that meet all the requirements<br />

of health and human dignity, and to adequate<br />

medical care, both preventive and remedial;<br />

– prohibition of all disciplinary measures constituting<br />

cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment<br />

including corporal punishment that may<br />

compromise the physical or mental health of<br />

the juveniles concerned; – right to fair and<br />

humane treatment, including the right to visits,<br />

to privacy, to communication with the outside<br />

world and to time for daily exercise; – provision<br />

of education (provided outside the detention<br />

facility by qualified teachers) suited to<br />

his her needs and designed to prepare him<br />

her for return to society; – ensuring that children<br />

are detained separately from adults unless<br />

they are members of the same family; –<br />

prohibition of death penalty<br />

A proper approach to juvenile justice also<br />

requires that efforts be made to prevent children<br />

coming into conflict with the law in the<br />

first place.<br />

Juvenile justice is a broad topic covering<br />

prevention of delinquency, the type of offences<br />

with which children may be charged and<br />

the way they are treated by the police, by the<br />

courts and in facilities for juvenile offenders.<br />

Therefore it is a multiple, inter-connected functional<br />

systems with different players .<br />

The functioning of a specific JJ system is<br />

often judged by whether it is:<br />

• effective; and<br />

• fair and humane – It must respect human<br />

dignity judged by references to international,<br />

regional and domestic JJ and HR standards<br />

and be considerate of the developmental<br />

needs (well-being) of a juvenile<br />

involved.<br />

Therefore states have to balance interest<br />

of the vulnerable juveniles from one hand and<br />

protection of society from the other through<br />

effective use of state resources.<br />

The aim of Juvenile Jusice system is to<br />

encourage a behavioral change of a juvenile<br />

involved by helping him/her to feel accountable<br />

and to understand the consequences of<br />

his/her actions; avoid or minimize intervention<br />

by the formal justice system; promote reintegration<br />

as the main goal of treatment; employ<br />

other than punitive responses (such as deprivation<br />

of liberty).<br />

In order to avoid or minimize the intervention<br />

by the formal justice system, various alternative<br />

programs were developed to reach<br />

that aim. But the alternative programs are<br />

designed and limited to the: 1. first-time offenders,<br />

2. offenders accused of non-serious<br />

acts 3. offenders who admit the offence:<br />

Alternative programs include: 1. police<br />

caution – the police decide not to press formal<br />

charges but simply to warn the juvenile<br />

and parents that any recurrence of that behavior<br />

will result in a court appearance; 2.<br />

French Rappel a la loi – formal meeting of<br />

representatives of court, juvenile and parents<br />

within which the juvenile is appraised of the<br />

legal text relating to the offence as well as of<br />

the potential sentences of the court; 3. Screening<br />

process carried out by a social worker<br />

before the court appearance and offer that if<br />

the juvenile agrees to the offence and than<br />

can satisfactorily complete a special course<br />

the prosecution will drop the case.<br />

In Scotland “children’s hearings” system<br />

conditions of the hearing are less formal and<br />

adversarial than in court setting; a panel of<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!